Prestige: radiologic technologists rate themselves and other allied health professionals.

H. R. Glazer-Waldman; H. J. Parker; F. Chan

Prestige: radiologic technologists rate themselves and other allied health professionals.

H. R. Glazer-Waldman, H. J. Parker, F. Chan

復健諮商研究所

研究成果: Article › 同行評審

1 引文斯高帕斯（Scopus）

摘要

This study investigated radiologic technologists' (RTs) prestige ratings of 13 allied health professions and 13 general occupations selected from the original National Opinion Research Center (NORC) list. RTs ranked themselves fifth and on the whole tended to elevate the ratings of the allied health professions. There was a high degree of agreement between RTs' ratings and the NORC occupations data. Implications for the RT profession and for future research are noted.

原文	English
頁（從 - 到）	419-423
頁數	5
期刊	Radiologic Technology
卷	60
發行號	5
出版狀態	Published - 1989 五月 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

存取文件

指紋深入研究「Prestige: radiologic technologists rate themselves and other allied health professionals.」主題。共同形成了獨特的指紋。

引用此

@article{5947e6e48b174a1086f52fb94e962aed,

title = "Prestige: radiologic technologists rate themselves and other allied health professionals.",

abstract = "This study investigated radiologic technologists' (RTs) prestige ratings of 13 allied health professions and 13 general occupations selected from the original National Opinion Research Center (NORC) list. RTs ranked themselves fifth and on the whole tended to elevate the ratings of the allied health professions. There was a high degree of agreement between RTs' ratings and the NORC occupations data. Implications for the RT profession and for future research are noted.",

author = "Glazer-Waldman, {H. R.} and Parker, {H. J.} and F. Chan",

year = "1989",

month = may,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "60",

pages = "419--423",

journal = "Radiologic Technology",

issn = "0033-8397",

publisher = "Grune And Stratton",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prestige

T2 - radiologic technologists rate themselves and other allied health professionals.

AU - Glazer-Waldman, H. R.

AU - Parker, H. J.

AU - Chan, F.

PY - 1989/5/1

Y1 - 1989/5/1

N2 - This study investigated radiologic technologists' (RTs) prestige ratings of 13 allied health professions and 13 general occupations selected from the original National Opinion Research Center (NORC) list. RTs ranked themselves fifth and on the whole tended to elevate the ratings of the allied health professions. There was a high degree of agreement between RTs' ratings and the NORC occupations data. Implications for the RT profession and for future research are noted.

AB - This study investigated radiologic technologists' (RTs) prestige ratings of 13 allied health professions and 13 general occupations selected from the original National Opinion Research Center (NORC) list. RTs ranked themselves fifth and on the whole tended to elevate the ratings of the allied health professions. There was a high degree of agreement between RTs' ratings and the NORC occupations data. Implications for the RT profession and for future research are noted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024673017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024673017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2734437

AN - SCOPUS:0024673017

VL - 60

SP - 419

EP - 423

JO - Radiologic Technology

JF - Radiologic Technology

SN - 0033-8397

IS - 5

ER -