Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes

Brian A. Bottge, Mary Heinrichs, Mary Zara Dee Mehta, Ya Hui Hung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of enhanced anchor instruction and traditional problem instruction in improving the problem-solving performance of 42 seventh-grade students with and without disabilities in general education classrooms. Qualitative research strategies embedded in a quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control-group design permitted investigators to describe and compare the problem-solving performances of individual students with disabilities in general education settings. Previous research has suggested that students with disabilities can solve math problems that are meaningful and motivating in remedial settings; however, few studies have examined whether those improvements can be achieved in general education classrooms. Results of this study indicated that the students without disabilities profited from contextualized instruction, but benefits for the students with disabilities were equivocal. Explanations for these findings are offered, and implications for instruction are described.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)186-200
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Special Education
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002 Jan 1

Fingerprint

general education
disability
Students
instruction
Education
student
classroom
Qualitative Research
performance
qualitative research
Research Personnel
Control Groups
Research
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Bottge, Brian A. ; Heinrichs, Mary ; Zara Dee Mehta, Mary ; Hung, Ya Hui. / Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. In: Journal of Special Education. 2002 ; Vol. 35, No. 4. pp. 186-200.
@article{ab09abac77e84e41bf1b5eac331b78c5,
title = "Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes",
abstract = "The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of enhanced anchor instruction and traditional problem instruction in improving the problem-solving performance of 42 seventh-grade students with and without disabilities in general education classrooms. Qualitative research strategies embedded in a quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control-group design permitted investigators to describe and compare the problem-solving performances of individual students with disabilities in general education settings. Previous research has suggested that students with disabilities can solve math problems that are meaningful and motivating in remedial settings; however, few studies have examined whether those improvements can be achieved in general education classrooms. Results of this study indicated that the students without disabilities profited from contextualized instruction, but benefits for the students with disabilities were equivocal. Explanations for these findings are offered, and implications for instruction are described.",
author = "Bottge, {Brian A.} and Mary Heinrichs and {Zara Dee Mehta}, Mary and Hung, {Ya Hui}",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/002246690203500401",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "186--200",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes. / Bottge, Brian A.; Heinrichs, Mary; Zara Dee Mehta, Mary; Hung, Ya Hui.

In: Journal of Special Education, Vol. 35, No. 4, 01.01.2002, p. 186-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Weighing the benefits of anchored math instruction for students with disabilities in general education classes

AU - Bottge, Brian A.

AU - Heinrichs, Mary

AU - Zara Dee Mehta, Mary

AU - Hung, Ya Hui

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of enhanced anchor instruction and traditional problem instruction in improving the problem-solving performance of 42 seventh-grade students with and without disabilities in general education classrooms. Qualitative research strategies embedded in a quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control-group design permitted investigators to describe and compare the problem-solving performances of individual students with disabilities in general education settings. Previous research has suggested that students with disabilities can solve math problems that are meaningful and motivating in remedial settings; however, few studies have examined whether those improvements can be achieved in general education classrooms. Results of this study indicated that the students without disabilities profited from contextualized instruction, but benefits for the students with disabilities were equivocal. Explanations for these findings are offered, and implications for instruction are described.

AB - The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of enhanced anchor instruction and traditional problem instruction in improving the problem-solving performance of 42 seventh-grade students with and without disabilities in general education classrooms. Qualitative research strategies embedded in a quasi-experimental, nonequivalent control-group design permitted investigators to describe and compare the problem-solving performances of individual students with disabilities in general education settings. Previous research has suggested that students with disabilities can solve math problems that are meaningful and motivating in remedial settings; however, few studies have examined whether those improvements can be achieved in general education classrooms. Results of this study indicated that the students without disabilities profited from contextualized instruction, but benefits for the students with disabilities were equivocal. Explanations for these findings are offered, and implications for instruction are described.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036003704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036003704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002246690203500401

DO - 10.1177/002246690203500401

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0036003704

VL - 35

SP - 186

EP - 200

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 4

ER -