University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment

Meichun Lydia Wen, Chin Chung Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

114 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of peer assessment (PA) as an alternative form of evaluation method is reported to be helpful in learning and is increasingly being adopted in higher education settings. Through collecting data from 280 university students in Taiwan, a 20-item instrument was developed to investigate university students' attitudes toward and perceptions of PA and online PA. Four subscales, Positive Attitudes, Online Attitudes, Understanding-and-Action, and Negative Attitudes, were extracted and reliabilities were calculated. Results revealed that participating students held positive attitudes toward the use of PA activities, but they viewed online PA as a technical tool to facilitate assessment processes, rather than as a learning aid. Male students had more positive attitudes toward PA than females did, and students with previous PA experiences had less negative attitudes toward PA. A majority of these students suggested that the PA score should be counted as a small part of the total course grade, and there was an effect of the perceived importance of PA score on students' attitudes toward these four subscales.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-44
Number of pages18
JournalHigher Education
Volume51
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Jan 1

Fingerprint

student
Student Perceptions
Peer Assessment
learning aid
university
Taiwan
evaluation
Positive Attitudes
learning
education
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{650b8b1cac324727baa00b9d114e6da0,
title = "University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment",
abstract = "The use of peer assessment (PA) as an alternative form of evaluation method is reported to be helpful in learning and is increasingly being adopted in higher education settings. Through collecting data from 280 university students in Taiwan, a 20-item instrument was developed to investigate university students' attitudes toward and perceptions of PA and online PA. Four subscales, Positive Attitudes, Online Attitudes, Understanding-and-Action, and Negative Attitudes, were extracted and reliabilities were calculated. Results revealed that participating students held positive attitudes toward the use of PA activities, but they viewed online PA as a technical tool to facilitate assessment processes, rather than as a learning aid. Male students had more positive attitudes toward PA than females did, and students with previous PA experiences had less negative attitudes toward PA. A majority of these students suggested that the PA score should be counted as a small part of the total course grade, and there was an effect of the perceived importance of PA score on students' attitudes toward these four subscales.",
author = "Wen, {Meichun Lydia} and Tsai, {Chin Chung}",
year = "2006",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "27--44",
journal = "Higher Education",
issn = "0018-1560",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. / Wen, Meichun Lydia; Tsai, Chin Chung.

In: Higher Education, Vol. 51, No. 1, 01.01.2006, p. 27-44.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment

AU - Wen, Meichun Lydia

AU - Tsai, Chin Chung

PY - 2006/1/1

Y1 - 2006/1/1

N2 - The use of peer assessment (PA) as an alternative form of evaluation method is reported to be helpful in learning and is increasingly being adopted in higher education settings. Through collecting data from 280 university students in Taiwan, a 20-item instrument was developed to investigate university students' attitudes toward and perceptions of PA and online PA. Four subscales, Positive Attitudes, Online Attitudes, Understanding-and-Action, and Negative Attitudes, were extracted and reliabilities were calculated. Results revealed that participating students held positive attitudes toward the use of PA activities, but they viewed online PA as a technical tool to facilitate assessment processes, rather than as a learning aid. Male students had more positive attitudes toward PA than females did, and students with previous PA experiences had less negative attitudes toward PA. A majority of these students suggested that the PA score should be counted as a small part of the total course grade, and there was an effect of the perceived importance of PA score on students' attitudes toward these four subscales.

AB - The use of peer assessment (PA) as an alternative form of evaluation method is reported to be helpful in learning and is increasingly being adopted in higher education settings. Through collecting data from 280 university students in Taiwan, a 20-item instrument was developed to investigate university students' attitudes toward and perceptions of PA and online PA. Four subscales, Positive Attitudes, Online Attitudes, Understanding-and-Action, and Negative Attitudes, were extracted and reliabilities were calculated. Results revealed that participating students held positive attitudes toward the use of PA activities, but they viewed online PA as a technical tool to facilitate assessment processes, rather than as a learning aid. Male students had more positive attitudes toward PA than females did, and students with previous PA experiences had less negative attitudes toward PA. A majority of these students suggested that the PA score should be counted as a small part of the total course grade, and there was an effect of the perceived importance of PA score on students' attitudes toward these four subscales.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31444456024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31444456024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8

DO - 10.1007/s10734-004-6375-8

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 27

EP - 44

JO - Higher Education

JF - Higher Education

SN - 0018-1560

IS - 1

ER -