Abstract
R. K. Goodyear (2000) criticized the methodology and results of a study which demonstrated that during the editorial terms of Goodyear (1984-1990) and Claiborn (1990-1993) there was a trend toward publishing articles written by psychologists as opposed to counselors in the Journal of Counseling & Development (JCD). The issue of journal content goes to the heart of professional identity. The authors assert that professional affiliation of contributors matters less than the content of the articles published in JCD (i.e., articles must "speak" the language of counselors and not the language of some other mental health professional).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 166-170 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Counseling and Development |
| Volume | 79 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 Jan 1 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Applied Psychology
Cite this
}
The professional identity of contributors to the journal of counseling & development : Does it matter? / Weinrach, Stephen G.; Thomas, Kenneth R.; Chan, Fong.
In: Journal of Counseling and Development, Vol. 79, No. 2, 01.01.2001, p. 166-170.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - The professional identity of contributors to the journal of counseling & development
T2 - Does it matter?
AU - Weinrach, Stephen G.
AU - Thomas, Kenneth R.
AU - Chan, Fong
PY - 2001/1/1
Y1 - 2001/1/1
N2 - R. K. Goodyear (2000) criticized the methodology and results of a study which demonstrated that during the editorial terms of Goodyear (1984-1990) and Claiborn (1990-1993) there was a trend toward publishing articles written by psychologists as opposed to counselors in the Journal of Counseling & Development (JCD). The issue of journal content goes to the heart of professional identity. The authors assert that professional affiliation of contributors matters less than the content of the articles published in JCD (i.e., articles must "speak" the language of counselors and not the language of some other mental health professional).
AB - R. K. Goodyear (2000) criticized the methodology and results of a study which demonstrated that during the editorial terms of Goodyear (1984-1990) and Claiborn (1990-1993) there was a trend toward publishing articles written by psychologists as opposed to counselors in the Journal of Counseling & Development (JCD). The issue of journal content goes to the heart of professional identity. The authors assert that professional affiliation of contributors matters less than the content of the articles published in JCD (i.e., articles must "speak" the language of counselors and not the language of some other mental health professional).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035588566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035588566&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01956.x
DO - 10.1002/j.1556-6676.2001.tb01956.x
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035588566
VL - 79
SP - 166
EP - 170
JO - Journal of Counseling and Development
JF - Journal of Counseling and Development
SN - 0748-9633
IS - 2
ER -