The effects of static versus dynamic 3D representations on 10th grade students' atomic orbital mental model construction: Evidence from eye movement behaviors

Sheng Chang Chen, Mi Shan Hsiao, Hsiao Ching She

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)


Abstract This study examined the effectiveness of the different spatial abilities of high school students who constructed their understanding of the atomic orbital concepts and mental models after learning with multimedia learning materials presented in static and dynamic modes of 3D representation. A total of 60 high school students participated in this study and were randomly assigned into static and dynamic 3D representation groups. The dependent variables included a pre-test and post-test on atomic orbital concepts, an atomic orbital mental model construction test, and students' eye-movement behaviors. Results showed that students who learned with dynamic 3D representation allocated a significantly greater amount of attention, exhibited better performance on the mental model test, and constructed more sophisticated 3D hybridizations of the orbital mental model than the students in the static 3D group. The logistic regression result indicated that the dynamic 3D representation group students' number of saccades and number of re-readings were positive predictors, while the number of fixations was the negative predictor, for developing the students' 3D mental models of an atomic orbital. High-spatial-ability students outperformed the low-spatial-ability students on the atomic orbital conceptual test and mental model construction, while both types of students allocated similar amounts of attention to the 3D representations. Our results demonstrated that low-spatial-ability students' eye movement behaviors positively correlate with their performance on the atomic orbital concept test and the mental model construction.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3563
Pages (from-to)169-180
Number of pages12
JournalComputers in Human Behavior
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jul 13


All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this