Technology-supported Learning in Secondary and Undergraduate Biological Education: Observations from Literature Review

Silvia Wen-Yu Lee, Chin Chung Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We conducted a literature review of using educational technology in biology learning from 2001 to 2010. A total of 36 empirical articles were included for review. Based upon the content analyses of these studies, such as technologies utilized, student sample, biological topics involved, the research purpose, and methodology, the following observations were revealed. Among the different types of technologies, the majority of studies utilized simulations or visualization tools. Genetics and molecular biology were the most popular biological topics. Most studies examined students' conceptual outcomes, fewer studies examined affective outcomes, and a few studies examined higher-order skills. Also a small number of studies observed students' learning processes. Beyond simply the comparison for traditional teaching versus technology-assisted learning, some studies emphasized comparing different technologies or different representations. This review also suggested some future research directions. For example, more studies should use technologies for interdisciplinary training and for fostering problem-solving skills.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)226-233
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Science Education and Technology
Volume22
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Education
learning
Students
education
biology
Educational technology
Molecular biology
student
educational technology
visualization
learning process
Teaching
Visualization
literature
simulation
methodology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

@article{c6805d32a90446eaa6d979e3eed66236,
title = "Technology-supported Learning in Secondary and Undergraduate Biological Education: Observations from Literature Review",
abstract = "We conducted a literature review of using educational technology in biology learning from 2001 to 2010. A total of 36 empirical articles were included for review. Based upon the content analyses of these studies, such as technologies utilized, student sample, biological topics involved, the research purpose, and methodology, the following observations were revealed. Among the different types of technologies, the majority of studies utilized simulations or visualization tools. Genetics and molecular biology were the most popular biological topics. Most studies examined students' conceptual outcomes, fewer studies examined affective outcomes, and a few studies examined higher-order skills. Also a small number of studies observed students' learning processes. Beyond simply the comparison for traditional teaching versus technology-assisted learning, some studies emphasized comparing different technologies or different representations. This review also suggested some future research directions. For example, more studies should use technologies for interdisciplinary training and for fostering problem-solving skills.",
author = "Lee, {Silvia Wen-Yu} and Tsai, {Chin Chung}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10956-012-9388-6",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "226--233",
journal = "Journal of Science Education and Technology",
issn = "1059-0145",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "2",

}

Technology-supported Learning in Secondary and Undergraduate Biological Education : Observations from Literature Review. / Lee, Silvia Wen-Yu; Tsai, Chin Chung.

In: Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 2, 01.01.2013, p. 226-233.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Technology-supported Learning in Secondary and Undergraduate Biological Education

T2 - Observations from Literature Review

AU - Lee, Silvia Wen-Yu

AU - Tsai, Chin Chung

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - We conducted a literature review of using educational technology in biology learning from 2001 to 2010. A total of 36 empirical articles were included for review. Based upon the content analyses of these studies, such as technologies utilized, student sample, biological topics involved, the research purpose, and methodology, the following observations were revealed. Among the different types of technologies, the majority of studies utilized simulations or visualization tools. Genetics and molecular biology were the most popular biological topics. Most studies examined students' conceptual outcomes, fewer studies examined affective outcomes, and a few studies examined higher-order skills. Also a small number of studies observed students' learning processes. Beyond simply the comparison for traditional teaching versus technology-assisted learning, some studies emphasized comparing different technologies or different representations. This review also suggested some future research directions. For example, more studies should use technologies for interdisciplinary training and for fostering problem-solving skills.

AB - We conducted a literature review of using educational technology in biology learning from 2001 to 2010. A total of 36 empirical articles were included for review. Based upon the content analyses of these studies, such as technologies utilized, student sample, biological topics involved, the research purpose, and methodology, the following observations were revealed. Among the different types of technologies, the majority of studies utilized simulations or visualization tools. Genetics and molecular biology were the most popular biological topics. Most studies examined students' conceptual outcomes, fewer studies examined affective outcomes, and a few studies examined higher-order skills. Also a small number of studies observed students' learning processes. Beyond simply the comparison for traditional teaching versus technology-assisted learning, some studies emphasized comparing different technologies or different representations. This review also suggested some future research directions. For example, more studies should use technologies for interdisciplinary training and for fostering problem-solving skills.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874990500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874990500&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10956-012-9388-6

DO - 10.1007/s10956-012-9388-6

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84874990500

VL - 22

SP - 226

EP - 233

JO - Journal of Science Education and Technology

JF - Journal of Science Education and Technology

SN - 1059-0145

IS - 2

ER -