TA-designed vs. research-oriented problem solutions

Shih Yin Lin; Chandralekha Singh; William Mamudi; Charles Henderson; Edit Yerushalmi

doi:10.1063/1.3680043

TA-designed vs. research-oriented problem solutions

Shih Yin Lin, Chandralekha Singh, William Mamudi, Charles Henderson, Edit Yerushalmi

Department of Physics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In order to study graduate teaching assistants (TAs) beliefs and values about the design of instructor problem solutions, twenty-four TAs were provided with different solutions and asked to discuss their preferences for prominent solution features. TAs preferences for solution features were examined in light of the modeling of expert-like problem solving process as recommended in the literature. Results suggest that while many of the features TAs valued align with expert-like problem solving approaches, they noticed primarily "surface features" of solutions. Moreover, self-reported preferences did not match well with the solutions TAs wrote on their own.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	2011 Physics Education Research Conference
Pages	255-258
Number of pages	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680043
Publication status	Published - 2012
Event	2011 Physics Education Research Conference - Omaha, NE, United States Duration: 2011 Aug 3 → 2011 Aug 4

Publication series

Name	AIP Conference Proceedings
Volume	1413
ISSN (Print)	0094-243X
ISSN (Electronic)	1551-7616

Other

Other	2011 Physics Education Research Conference
Country	United States
City	Omaha, NE
Period	11-08-03 → 11-08-04

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Physics and Astronomy(all)

Access to Document

10.1063/1.3680043

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'TA-designed vs. research-oriented problem solutions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@inproceedings{18e1849fd8f64eefbdedf570679d1ee2,

title = "TA-designed vs. research-oriented problem solutions",

abstract = "In order to study graduate teaching assistants (TAs) beliefs and values about the design of instructor problem solutions, twenty-four TAs were provided with different solutions and asked to discuss their preferences for prominent solution features. TAs preferences for solution features were examined in light of the modeling of expert-like problem solving process as recommended in the literature. Results suggest that while many of the features TAs valued align with expert-like problem solving approaches, they noticed primarily {"}surface features{"} of solutions. Moreover, self-reported preferences did not match well with the solutions TAs wrote on their own.",

author = "Lin, {Shih Yin} and Chandralekha Singh and William Mamudi and Charles Henderson and Edit Yerushalmi",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1063/1.3680043",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780735409903",

series = "AIP Conference Proceedings",

pages = "255--258",

booktitle = "2011 Physics Education Research Conference",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - TA-designed vs. research-oriented problem solutions

AU - Lin, Shih Yin

AU - Singh, Chandralekha

AU - Mamudi, William

AU - Henderson, Charles

AU - Yerushalmi, Edit

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In order to study graduate teaching assistants (TAs) beliefs and values about the design of instructor problem solutions, twenty-four TAs were provided with different solutions and asked to discuss their preferences for prominent solution features. TAs preferences for solution features were examined in light of the modeling of expert-like problem solving process as recommended in the literature. Results suggest that while many of the features TAs valued align with expert-like problem solving approaches, they noticed primarily "surface features" of solutions. Moreover, self-reported preferences did not match well with the solutions TAs wrote on their own.

AB - In order to study graduate teaching assistants (TAs) beliefs and values about the design of instructor problem solutions, twenty-four TAs were provided with different solutions and asked to discuss their preferences for prominent solution features. TAs preferences for solution features were examined in light of the modeling of expert-like problem solving process as recommended in the literature. Results suggest that while many of the features TAs valued align with expert-like problem solving approaches, they noticed primarily "surface features" of solutions. Moreover, self-reported preferences did not match well with the solutions TAs wrote on their own.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84863166439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84863166439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1063/1.3680043

DO - 10.1063/1.3680043

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84863166439

SN - 9780735409903

T3 - AIP Conference Proceedings

SP - 255

EP - 258

BT - 2011 Physics Education Research Conference

T2 - 2011 Physics Education Research Conference

Y2 - 3 August 2011 through 4 August 2011

ER -