Stigmatizing attitudes towards individuals with mental illness in Hong Kong: Implications for their recovery

Hector W.H. Tsang, Phidias K.C. Tam, Fong Chan, W. M. Cheung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

99 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The literature suggests that stigmatizing attitudes in the community will affect lives and recovery of people with mental illness. This is particularly serious and obvious in Chinese societies where mental illness is often associated with shame and stigma. As Hong Kong and China have undergone rapid changes in terms of social and economic development, this study aimed at providing the most up-to-date empirical information regarding mental illness stigma and its impact on individuals with mental illness. A 31-item Questionnaire on Mental Illness was developed to measure public attitudes towards mental illness, with special reference to issues that affected the burden on family members of mental health consumers. The questionnaire together with the Level of Contact Sub-scale (Holmes et al., 1999) was distributed to primary and secondary students for their friends and relatives aged 16 or above to complete. A total of 1,007 validly completed questionnaires were returned constituting a response rate of 74%. An exploratory factor analysis identified eight factors which accounted for 50.6% of the total variance: hostility, aberrant, openness, resources, acceptance, rights, misgivings, and accommodation. The data showed that there were rather severe stigmatizing attitudes in the community, such as beliefs about parents causing the illness, strong opposition to setting up psychiatric community facilities near their residence, and limited employment opportunities for people with mental illness, which also increased both the subjective and objective burdens on clients' relatives by denying them social and practical support. Correlations between previous contacts and attitudes are significant. Implications to further research and social policy are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)383-396
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Community Psychology
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Hong Kong
Shame
Hostility
Economic Development
Public Policy
Statistical Factor Analysis
Psychiatry
China
Mental Health
Parents
Students
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

@article{22bc4daa56284585a89f48292ae04ade,
title = "Stigmatizing attitudes towards individuals with mental illness in Hong Kong: Implications for their recovery",
abstract = "The literature suggests that stigmatizing attitudes in the community will affect lives and recovery of people with mental illness. This is particularly serious and obvious in Chinese societies where mental illness is often associated with shame and stigma. As Hong Kong and China have undergone rapid changes in terms of social and economic development, this study aimed at providing the most up-to-date empirical information regarding mental illness stigma and its impact on individuals with mental illness. A 31-item Questionnaire on Mental Illness was developed to measure public attitudes towards mental illness, with special reference to issues that affected the burden on family members of mental health consumers. The questionnaire together with the Level of Contact Sub-scale (Holmes et al., 1999) was distributed to primary and secondary students for their friends and relatives aged 16 or above to complete. A total of 1,007 validly completed questionnaires were returned constituting a response rate of 74{\%}. An exploratory factor analysis identified eight factors which accounted for 50.6{\%} of the total variance: hostility, aberrant, openness, resources, acceptance, rights, misgivings, and accommodation. The data showed that there were rather severe stigmatizing attitudes in the community, such as beliefs about parents causing the illness, strong opposition to setting up psychiatric community facilities near their residence, and limited employment opportunities for people with mental illness, which also increased both the subjective and objective burdens on clients' relatives by denying them social and practical support. Correlations between previous contacts and attitudes are significant. Implications to further research and social policy are discussed.",
author = "Tsang, {Hector W.H.} and Tam, {Phidias K.C.} and Fong Chan and Cheung, {W. M.}",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jcop.10055",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "383--396",
journal = "Journal of Community Psychology",
issn = "0090-4392",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Stigmatizing attitudes towards individuals with mental illness in Hong Kong : Implications for their recovery. / Tsang, Hector W.H.; Tam, Phidias K.C.; Chan, Fong; Cheung, W. M.

In: Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.07.2003, p. 383-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Stigmatizing attitudes towards individuals with mental illness in Hong Kong

T2 - Implications for their recovery

AU - Tsang, Hector W.H.

AU - Tam, Phidias K.C.

AU - Chan, Fong

AU - Cheung, W. M.

PY - 2003/7/1

Y1 - 2003/7/1

N2 - The literature suggests that stigmatizing attitudes in the community will affect lives and recovery of people with mental illness. This is particularly serious and obvious in Chinese societies where mental illness is often associated with shame and stigma. As Hong Kong and China have undergone rapid changes in terms of social and economic development, this study aimed at providing the most up-to-date empirical information regarding mental illness stigma and its impact on individuals with mental illness. A 31-item Questionnaire on Mental Illness was developed to measure public attitudes towards mental illness, with special reference to issues that affected the burden on family members of mental health consumers. The questionnaire together with the Level of Contact Sub-scale (Holmes et al., 1999) was distributed to primary and secondary students for their friends and relatives aged 16 or above to complete. A total of 1,007 validly completed questionnaires were returned constituting a response rate of 74%. An exploratory factor analysis identified eight factors which accounted for 50.6% of the total variance: hostility, aberrant, openness, resources, acceptance, rights, misgivings, and accommodation. The data showed that there were rather severe stigmatizing attitudes in the community, such as beliefs about parents causing the illness, strong opposition to setting up psychiatric community facilities near their residence, and limited employment opportunities for people with mental illness, which also increased both the subjective and objective burdens on clients' relatives by denying them social and practical support. Correlations between previous contacts and attitudes are significant. Implications to further research and social policy are discussed.

AB - The literature suggests that stigmatizing attitudes in the community will affect lives and recovery of people with mental illness. This is particularly serious and obvious in Chinese societies where mental illness is often associated with shame and stigma. As Hong Kong and China have undergone rapid changes in terms of social and economic development, this study aimed at providing the most up-to-date empirical information regarding mental illness stigma and its impact on individuals with mental illness. A 31-item Questionnaire on Mental Illness was developed to measure public attitudes towards mental illness, with special reference to issues that affected the burden on family members of mental health consumers. The questionnaire together with the Level of Contact Sub-scale (Holmes et al., 1999) was distributed to primary and secondary students for their friends and relatives aged 16 or above to complete. A total of 1,007 validly completed questionnaires were returned constituting a response rate of 74%. An exploratory factor analysis identified eight factors which accounted for 50.6% of the total variance: hostility, aberrant, openness, resources, acceptance, rights, misgivings, and accommodation. The data showed that there were rather severe stigmatizing attitudes in the community, such as beliefs about parents causing the illness, strong opposition to setting up psychiatric community facilities near their residence, and limited employment opportunities for people with mental illness, which also increased both the subjective and objective burdens on clients' relatives by denying them social and practical support. Correlations between previous contacts and attitudes are significant. Implications to further research and social policy are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038237020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038237020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jcop.10055

DO - 10.1002/jcop.10055

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0038237020

VL - 31

SP - 383

EP - 396

JO - Journal of Community Psychology

JF - Journal of Community Psychology

SN - 0090-4392

IS - 4

ER -