Smoking policies among private employers and public agencies in texas: A statewide analysis

Nell H. Gottlieb, John J. Hedl, Michael P. Eriksen, Fong Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present study examined the prevalence, correlates, and perceived impact of smoking policies among private employers and public agencies in Texas. An identical survey instrument was administered to two groups of Texas employers: a random sample of private industries and all state agencies (excluding universities). Response rates were 62% (n = 420) for private industries and 73% (n = 130) for public agencies. Fifty-two percent of state agencies and 53% of private employers reported having a smoking policy, with the majority of policies having been implemented since 1986. Concern about employees' health or comfort was the most important reason for implementing a policy for both state agencies and private employers. Both groups believed that implementation of a policy resulted in fewer complaints from employees and less smoking in the workplace but had less impact on productivity or morale. This study on the prevalence of smoking policies in the workplace is the first to document that the majority of surveyed employers have a restrictive smoking policy in place. In addition, this study found minimal differences in the prevalence, rationale, and perceived benefits of smoking policies between private employers and state agencies. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:200-204]

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)200-204
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume81
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1989 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Smoking
Workplace
Industry
Cross-Sectional Studies
Morale
Occupational Health
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Cite this

Gottlieb, Nell H. ; Hedl, John J. ; Eriksen, Michael P. ; Chan, Fong. / Smoking policies among private employers and public agencies in texas : A statewide analysis. In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1989 ; Vol. 81, No. 3. pp. 200-204.
@article{c104e5e60e184565a7eb485c5d243761,
title = "Smoking policies among private employers and public agencies in texas: A statewide analysis",
abstract = "The present study examined the prevalence, correlates, and perceived impact of smoking policies among private employers and public agencies in Texas. An identical survey instrument was administered to two groups of Texas employers: a random sample of private industries and all state agencies (excluding universities). Response rates were 62{\%} (n = 420) for private industries and 73{\%} (n = 130) for public agencies. Fifty-two percent of state agencies and 53{\%} of private employers reported having a smoking policy, with the majority of policies having been implemented since 1986. Concern about employees' health or comfort was the most important reason for implementing a policy for both state agencies and private employers. Both groups believed that implementation of a policy resulted in fewer complaints from employees and less smoking in the workplace but had less impact on productivity or morale. This study on the prevalence of smoking policies in the workplace is the first to document that the majority of surveyed employers have a restrictive smoking policy in place. In addition, this study found minimal differences in the prevalence, rationale, and perceived benefits of smoking policies between private employers and state agencies. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:200-204]",
author = "Gottlieb, {Nell H.} and Hedl, {John J.} and Eriksen, {Michael P.} and Fong Chan",
year = "1989",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/jnci/81.3.200",
language = "English",
volume = "81",
pages = "200--204",
journal = "Journal of the National Cancer Institute",
issn = "0027-8874",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

Smoking policies among private employers and public agencies in texas : A statewide analysis. / Gottlieb, Nell H.; Hedl, John J.; Eriksen, Michael P.; Chan, Fong.

In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, Vol. 81, No. 3, 01.02.1989, p. 200-204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoking policies among private employers and public agencies in texas

T2 - A statewide analysis

AU - Gottlieb, Nell H.

AU - Hedl, John J.

AU - Eriksen, Michael P.

AU - Chan, Fong

PY - 1989/2/1

Y1 - 1989/2/1

N2 - The present study examined the prevalence, correlates, and perceived impact of smoking policies among private employers and public agencies in Texas. An identical survey instrument was administered to two groups of Texas employers: a random sample of private industries and all state agencies (excluding universities). Response rates were 62% (n = 420) for private industries and 73% (n = 130) for public agencies. Fifty-two percent of state agencies and 53% of private employers reported having a smoking policy, with the majority of policies having been implemented since 1986. Concern about employees' health or comfort was the most important reason for implementing a policy for both state agencies and private employers. Both groups believed that implementation of a policy resulted in fewer complaints from employees and less smoking in the workplace but had less impact on productivity or morale. This study on the prevalence of smoking policies in the workplace is the first to document that the majority of surveyed employers have a restrictive smoking policy in place. In addition, this study found minimal differences in the prevalence, rationale, and perceived benefits of smoking policies between private employers and state agencies. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:200-204]

AB - The present study examined the prevalence, correlates, and perceived impact of smoking policies among private employers and public agencies in Texas. An identical survey instrument was administered to two groups of Texas employers: a random sample of private industries and all state agencies (excluding universities). Response rates were 62% (n = 420) for private industries and 73% (n = 130) for public agencies. Fifty-two percent of state agencies and 53% of private employers reported having a smoking policy, with the majority of policies having been implemented since 1986. Concern about employees' health or comfort was the most important reason for implementing a policy for both state agencies and private employers. Both groups believed that implementation of a policy resulted in fewer complaints from employees and less smoking in the workplace but had less impact on productivity or morale. This study on the prevalence of smoking policies in the workplace is the first to document that the majority of surveyed employers have a restrictive smoking policy in place. In addition, this study found minimal differences in the prevalence, rationale, and perceived benefits of smoking policies between private employers and state agencies. [J Natl Cancer Inst 1989;81:200-204]

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024555009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024555009&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jnci/81.3.200

DO - 10.1093/jnci/81.3.200

M3 - Article

C2 - 2911083

AN - SCOPUS:0024555009

VL - 81

SP - 200

EP - 204

JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute

JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute

SN - 0027-8874

IS - 3

ER -