Scholarly productivity of editorial board members of three American counseling and counseling psychology journals

Stephen G. Weinrach, Kenneth R. Thomas, Steven R. Pruett, Fong Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The scholarly journals in professional and scientific fields serve the function of communicating new knowledge and informed discourse on the major issues affecting the field of counseling, and editorial board members (EBMs) serve as gatekeepers of what information will be communicated. The ability of EBMs to make sound judgments directly affects the quality of research and scholarship published. This study analyzed one important EBM qualification, the scholarly productivity of the editorial board members of three major American counseling journals (The Counseling Psychologist [TCP], the Journal of Counseling Psychology [JCP], and the Journal of Counseling and Development [JCD]). An analysis of the productivity rates of editorial board members on these journals was conducted using the PsycINFO database. The results indicated that editorial board members of JCP have significantly more experience publishing than members of TCP and JCD. The differential publication rates of editorial board members suggest that these three journals place different emphasis on scholarly productivity as part of their selection criteria for editorial board membership and may reflect that the three journals have different missions and serve different clientele. These findings have implications, not only for the profession of counseling in the United States, but also for the international counseling community.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)303-315
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal for the Advancement of Counselling
Volume28
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006 Sep 1

Fingerprint

counseling psychology
Counseling
counseling
productivity
Psychology
Efficiency
psychologist
gatekeeper
Aptitude
qualification
Patient Selection
Publications
profession

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Applied Psychology
  • Psychology (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{d6f8ddfffb5d4b8db09bf75e8dbf6687,
title = "Scholarly productivity of editorial board members of three American counseling and counseling psychology journals",
abstract = "The scholarly journals in professional and scientific fields serve the function of communicating new knowledge and informed discourse on the major issues affecting the field of counseling, and editorial board members (EBMs) serve as gatekeepers of what information will be communicated. The ability of EBMs to make sound judgments directly affects the quality of research and scholarship published. This study analyzed one important EBM qualification, the scholarly productivity of the editorial board members of three major American counseling journals (The Counseling Psychologist [TCP], the Journal of Counseling Psychology [JCP], and the Journal of Counseling and Development [JCD]). An analysis of the productivity rates of editorial board members on these journals was conducted using the PsycINFO database. The results indicated that editorial board members of JCP have significantly more experience publishing than members of TCP and JCD. The differential publication rates of editorial board members suggest that these three journals place different emphasis on scholarly productivity as part of their selection criteria for editorial board membership and may reflect that the three journals have different missions and serve different clientele. These findings have implications, not only for the profession of counseling in the United States, but also for the international counseling community.",
author = "Weinrach, {Stephen G.} and Thomas, {Kenneth R.} and Pruett, {Steven R.} and Fong Chan",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10447-005-9009-7",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "303--315",
journal = "International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling",
issn = "0165-0653",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

Scholarly productivity of editorial board members of three American counseling and counseling psychology journals. / Weinrach, Stephen G.; Thomas, Kenneth R.; Pruett, Steven R.; Chan, Fong.

In: International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, Vol. 28, No. 3, 01.09.2006, p. 303-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scholarly productivity of editorial board members of three American counseling and counseling psychology journals

AU - Weinrach, Stephen G.

AU - Thomas, Kenneth R.

AU - Pruett, Steven R.

AU - Chan, Fong

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - The scholarly journals in professional and scientific fields serve the function of communicating new knowledge and informed discourse on the major issues affecting the field of counseling, and editorial board members (EBMs) serve as gatekeepers of what information will be communicated. The ability of EBMs to make sound judgments directly affects the quality of research and scholarship published. This study analyzed one important EBM qualification, the scholarly productivity of the editorial board members of three major American counseling journals (The Counseling Psychologist [TCP], the Journal of Counseling Psychology [JCP], and the Journal of Counseling and Development [JCD]). An analysis of the productivity rates of editorial board members on these journals was conducted using the PsycINFO database. The results indicated that editorial board members of JCP have significantly more experience publishing than members of TCP and JCD. The differential publication rates of editorial board members suggest that these three journals place different emphasis on scholarly productivity as part of their selection criteria for editorial board membership and may reflect that the three journals have different missions and serve different clientele. These findings have implications, not only for the profession of counseling in the United States, but also for the international counseling community.

AB - The scholarly journals in professional and scientific fields serve the function of communicating new knowledge and informed discourse on the major issues affecting the field of counseling, and editorial board members (EBMs) serve as gatekeepers of what information will be communicated. The ability of EBMs to make sound judgments directly affects the quality of research and scholarship published. This study analyzed one important EBM qualification, the scholarly productivity of the editorial board members of three major American counseling journals (The Counseling Psychologist [TCP], the Journal of Counseling Psychology [JCP], and the Journal of Counseling and Development [JCD]). An analysis of the productivity rates of editorial board members on these journals was conducted using the PsycINFO database. The results indicated that editorial board members of JCP have significantly more experience publishing than members of TCP and JCD. The differential publication rates of editorial board members suggest that these three journals place different emphasis on scholarly productivity as part of their selection criteria for editorial board membership and may reflect that the three journals have different missions and serve different clientele. These findings have implications, not only for the profession of counseling in the United States, but also for the international counseling community.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749993247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749993247&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10447-005-9009-7

DO - 10.1007/s10447-005-9009-7

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 303

EP - 315

JO - International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling

JF - International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling

SN - 0165-0653

IS - 3

ER -