Research directions related to rehabilitation practice: A delphi study

Stanford E. Rubin, Brian T. McMahon, Fong Chan, Brian Kamnetz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A group of individuals holding leadership positions in the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification (CRCC), the Certification of Disability Management Specialists Commission (CDMSC), and the Commission for Case Manager Certification (CCMC) were surveyed using the Delphi technique. The objective was to obtain a consensus regarding priorities for rehabilitation credentialing and certification research in this era of health care and disability policy reform. Credentialing and role differentiation, outcome research, and practice trends were identified as high priority areas. The relevance of such research beyond rehabilitation certification and credentialing needs is discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19-26
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation
Volume64
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1998 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Delphi Technique
Certification
Credentialing
Rehabilitation
Research
Consensus
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Direction compound
Delivery of Health Care

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Rubin, S. E., McMahon, B. T., Chan, F., & Kamnetz, B. (1998). Research directions related to rehabilitation practice: A delphi study. Journal of Rehabilitation, 64(1), 19-26.
Rubin, Stanford E. ; McMahon, Brian T. ; Chan, Fong ; Kamnetz, Brian. / Research directions related to rehabilitation practice : A delphi study. In: Journal of Rehabilitation. 1998 ; Vol. 64, No. 1. pp. 19-26.
@article{692410666643493daa2eea5738da7962,
title = "Research directions related to rehabilitation practice: A delphi study",
abstract = "A group of individuals holding leadership positions in the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification (CRCC), the Certification of Disability Management Specialists Commission (CDMSC), and the Commission for Case Manager Certification (CCMC) were surveyed using the Delphi technique. The objective was to obtain a consensus regarding priorities for rehabilitation credentialing and certification research in this era of health care and disability policy reform. Credentialing and role differentiation, outcome research, and practice trends were identified as high priority areas. The relevance of such research beyond rehabilitation certification and credentialing needs is discussed.",
author = "Rubin, {Stanford E.} and McMahon, {Brian T.} and Fong Chan and Brian Kamnetz",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "19--26",
journal = "Journal of Rehabilitation",
issn = "0022-4154",
publisher = "National Rehabilitation Association",
number = "1",

}

Rubin, SE, McMahon, BT, Chan, F & Kamnetz, B 1998, 'Research directions related to rehabilitation practice: A delphi study', Journal of Rehabilitation, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 19-26.

Research directions related to rehabilitation practice : A delphi study. / Rubin, Stanford E.; McMahon, Brian T.; Chan, Fong; Kamnetz, Brian.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation, Vol. 64, No. 1, 01.01.1998, p. 19-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research directions related to rehabilitation practice

T2 - A delphi study

AU - Rubin, Stanford E.

AU - McMahon, Brian T.

AU - Chan, Fong

AU - Kamnetz, Brian

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - A group of individuals holding leadership positions in the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification (CRCC), the Certification of Disability Management Specialists Commission (CDMSC), and the Commission for Case Manager Certification (CCMC) were surveyed using the Delphi technique. The objective was to obtain a consensus regarding priorities for rehabilitation credentialing and certification research in this era of health care and disability policy reform. Credentialing and role differentiation, outcome research, and practice trends were identified as high priority areas. The relevance of such research beyond rehabilitation certification and credentialing needs is discussed.

AB - A group of individuals holding leadership positions in the Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification (CRCC), the Certification of Disability Management Specialists Commission (CDMSC), and the Commission for Case Manager Certification (CCMC) were surveyed using the Delphi technique. The objective was to obtain a consensus regarding priorities for rehabilitation credentialing and certification research in this era of health care and disability policy reform. Credentialing and role differentiation, outcome research, and practice trends were identified as high priority areas. The relevance of such research beyond rehabilitation certification and credentialing needs is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007875025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007875025&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0007875025

VL - 64

SP - 19

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Rehabilitation

SN - 0022-4154

IS - 1

ER -