Promising and evidence-based practices in vocational rehabilitation: Results of a national Delphi study

Michael J. Leahy, Roy J. Del Valle, Trenton J. Landon, Kanako Iwanaga, Susan G. Sherman, Antonio Reyes, Fong Chan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Recently, Leahy and his colleagues (Anderson, Leahy, Valle, Sherman, & Tansey, 2014; Del Valle, Leahy, Sherman, Anderson, Tansey, & Schoen, 2014; Leahy, Leahy, Chan, Lui, Rosenthal, Tansey, Wehman, P, & Menz, 2014; Sherman, Leahy, Del Valle, Anderson, Tansey, & Lui, 2014; Tansey, Bezyak, Chan, Leahy, & Lui, 2014) completed a comprehensive qualitative case study of four stateVRagencies (Maryland, Mississippi, Texas, and Utah) to identify promising or evidence-based practices that can be used to improve management and clinical rehabilitation counseling practices. Fourteen promising or evidence-based VR practices were reported by administrators, supervisors, and counselors in those four VR agencies as useful for improving psychosocial and employment outcomes of persons with disabilities receiving services from state rehabilitation agencies. Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe the outcomes of a Delphi study of experts on evidence-based VR practices. Methods: A Delphi study was conducted to obtain the consensus of 35 national experts in vocational rehabilitation (VR) on the relevance and levels of scientific evidence of 26 promising or evidence-based VR practices in state agency settings. Results: Consensus was achieved through three rounds of the Delphi process. National experts rated the employmentbased interventions as highly relevant to state VR service delivery practices, but rated their scientific evidence in the lower end of the hierarchy of evidence. Experts rated psychosocial and counseling interventions, except for motivational interviewing and working alliance, as less relevant to state VR, but as having high levels of scientific evidence. Conclusion: This study represents an important step towards identifying specific promising or evidence-based VR practices in state agency settings that could be used to improve psychosocial and employment outcomes for people with disabilities. The results can also be used to plan the in-service training agenda for state VR agencies in terms of professional development and in pre-service academic programs to ensure that rehabilitation counseling students are adequately trained in relation to these promising or evidence-based VR practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)37-48
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Vocational Rehabilitation
Volume48
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Delphi Technique
Vocational Rehabilitation
Evidence-Based Practice
Counseling
Rehabilitation
Disabled Persons
Consensus
Motivational Interviewing
Mississippi
Administrative Personnel

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Leahy, Michael J. ; Del Valle, Roy J. ; Landon, Trenton J. ; Iwanaga, Kanako ; Sherman, Susan G. ; Reyes, Antonio ; Chan, Fong. / Promising and evidence-based practices in vocational rehabilitation : Results of a national Delphi study. In: Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2018 ; Vol. 48, No. 1. pp. 37-48.
@article{1d8bdb272c8a45e1aa52fa58395ab19f,
title = "Promising and evidence-based practices in vocational rehabilitation: Results of a national Delphi study",
abstract = "Background: Recently, Leahy and his colleagues (Anderson, Leahy, Valle, Sherman, & Tansey, 2014; Del Valle, Leahy, Sherman, Anderson, Tansey, & Schoen, 2014; Leahy, Leahy, Chan, Lui, Rosenthal, Tansey, Wehman, P, & Menz, 2014; Sherman, Leahy, Del Valle, Anderson, Tansey, & Lui, 2014; Tansey, Bezyak, Chan, Leahy, & Lui, 2014) completed a comprehensive qualitative case study of four stateVRagencies (Maryland, Mississippi, Texas, and Utah) to identify promising or evidence-based practices that can be used to improve management and clinical rehabilitation counseling practices. Fourteen promising or evidence-based VR practices were reported by administrators, supervisors, and counselors in those four VR agencies as useful for improving psychosocial and employment outcomes of persons with disabilities receiving services from state rehabilitation agencies. Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe the outcomes of a Delphi study of experts on evidence-based VR practices. Methods: A Delphi study was conducted to obtain the consensus of 35 national experts in vocational rehabilitation (VR) on the relevance and levels of scientific evidence of 26 promising or evidence-based VR practices in state agency settings. Results: Consensus was achieved through three rounds of the Delphi process. National experts rated the employmentbased interventions as highly relevant to state VR service delivery practices, but rated their scientific evidence in the lower end of the hierarchy of evidence. Experts rated psychosocial and counseling interventions, except for motivational interviewing and working alliance, as less relevant to state VR, but as having high levels of scientific evidence. Conclusion: This study represents an important step towards identifying specific promising or evidence-based VR practices in state agency settings that could be used to improve psychosocial and employment outcomes for people with disabilities. The results can also be used to plan the in-service training agenda for state VR agencies in terms of professional development and in pre-service academic programs to ensure that rehabilitation counseling students are adequately trained in relation to these promising or evidence-based VR practices.",
author = "Leahy, {Michael J.} and {Del Valle}, {Roy J.} and Landon, {Trenton J.} and Kanako Iwanaga and Sherman, {Susan G.} and Antonio Reyes and Fong Chan",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/JVR-170914",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "37--48",
journal = "Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1052-2263",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "1",

}

Promising and evidence-based practices in vocational rehabilitation : Results of a national Delphi study. / Leahy, Michael J.; Del Valle, Roy J.; Landon, Trenton J.; Iwanaga, Kanako; Sherman, Susan G.; Reyes, Antonio; Chan, Fong.

In: Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, Vol. 48, No. 1, 01.01.2018, p. 37-48.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promising and evidence-based practices in vocational rehabilitation

T2 - Results of a national Delphi study

AU - Leahy, Michael J.

AU - Del Valle, Roy J.

AU - Landon, Trenton J.

AU - Iwanaga, Kanako

AU - Sherman, Susan G.

AU - Reyes, Antonio

AU - Chan, Fong

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: Recently, Leahy and his colleagues (Anderson, Leahy, Valle, Sherman, & Tansey, 2014; Del Valle, Leahy, Sherman, Anderson, Tansey, & Schoen, 2014; Leahy, Leahy, Chan, Lui, Rosenthal, Tansey, Wehman, P, & Menz, 2014; Sherman, Leahy, Del Valle, Anderson, Tansey, & Lui, 2014; Tansey, Bezyak, Chan, Leahy, & Lui, 2014) completed a comprehensive qualitative case study of four stateVRagencies (Maryland, Mississippi, Texas, and Utah) to identify promising or evidence-based practices that can be used to improve management and clinical rehabilitation counseling practices. Fourteen promising or evidence-based VR practices were reported by administrators, supervisors, and counselors in those four VR agencies as useful for improving psychosocial and employment outcomes of persons with disabilities receiving services from state rehabilitation agencies. Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe the outcomes of a Delphi study of experts on evidence-based VR practices. Methods: A Delphi study was conducted to obtain the consensus of 35 national experts in vocational rehabilitation (VR) on the relevance and levels of scientific evidence of 26 promising or evidence-based VR practices in state agency settings. Results: Consensus was achieved through three rounds of the Delphi process. National experts rated the employmentbased interventions as highly relevant to state VR service delivery practices, but rated their scientific evidence in the lower end of the hierarchy of evidence. Experts rated psychosocial and counseling interventions, except for motivational interviewing and working alliance, as less relevant to state VR, but as having high levels of scientific evidence. Conclusion: This study represents an important step towards identifying specific promising or evidence-based VR practices in state agency settings that could be used to improve psychosocial and employment outcomes for people with disabilities. The results can also be used to plan the in-service training agenda for state VR agencies in terms of professional development and in pre-service academic programs to ensure that rehabilitation counseling students are adequately trained in relation to these promising or evidence-based VR practices.

AB - Background: Recently, Leahy and his colleagues (Anderson, Leahy, Valle, Sherman, & Tansey, 2014; Del Valle, Leahy, Sherman, Anderson, Tansey, & Schoen, 2014; Leahy, Leahy, Chan, Lui, Rosenthal, Tansey, Wehman, P, & Menz, 2014; Sherman, Leahy, Del Valle, Anderson, Tansey, & Lui, 2014; Tansey, Bezyak, Chan, Leahy, & Lui, 2014) completed a comprehensive qualitative case study of four stateVRagencies (Maryland, Mississippi, Texas, and Utah) to identify promising or evidence-based practices that can be used to improve management and clinical rehabilitation counseling practices. Fourteen promising or evidence-based VR practices were reported by administrators, supervisors, and counselors in those four VR agencies as useful for improving psychosocial and employment outcomes of persons with disabilities receiving services from state rehabilitation agencies. Objective: The purpose of this article is to describe the outcomes of a Delphi study of experts on evidence-based VR practices. Methods: A Delphi study was conducted to obtain the consensus of 35 national experts in vocational rehabilitation (VR) on the relevance and levels of scientific evidence of 26 promising or evidence-based VR practices in state agency settings. Results: Consensus was achieved through three rounds of the Delphi process. National experts rated the employmentbased interventions as highly relevant to state VR service delivery practices, but rated their scientific evidence in the lower end of the hierarchy of evidence. Experts rated psychosocial and counseling interventions, except for motivational interviewing and working alliance, as less relevant to state VR, but as having high levels of scientific evidence. Conclusion: This study represents an important step towards identifying specific promising or evidence-based VR practices in state agency settings that could be used to improve psychosocial and employment outcomes for people with disabilities. The results can also be used to plan the in-service training agenda for state VR agencies in terms of professional development and in pre-service academic programs to ensure that rehabilitation counseling students are adequately trained in relation to these promising or evidence-based VR practices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043687528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043687528&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/JVR-170914

DO - 10.3233/JVR-170914

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85043687528

VL - 48

SP - 37

EP - 48

JO - Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation

SN - 1052-2263

IS - 1

ER -