Prestige: radiologic technologists rate themselves and other allied health professionals.

H. R. Glazer-Waldman; H. J. Parker; F. Chan

Prestige: radiologic technologists rate themselves and other allied health professionals.

H. R. Glazer-Waldman, H. J. Parker, F. Chan

Graduate Institute of Rehabilitation Counseling

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigated radiologic technologists' (RTs) prestige ratings of 13 allied health professions and 13 general occupations selected from the original National Opinion Research Center (NORC) list. RTs ranked themselves fifth and on the whole tended to elevate the ratings of the allied health professions. There was a high degree of agreement between RTs' ratings and the NORC occupations data. Implications for the RT profession and for future research are noted.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	419-423
Number of pages	5
Journal	Radiologic Technology
Volume	60
Issue number	5
Publication status	Published - 1989 May 1

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Prestige: radiologic technologists rate themselves and other allied health professionals.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{5947e6e48b174a1086f52fb94e962aed,

title = "Prestige: radiologic technologists rate themselves and other allied health professionals.",

abstract = "This study investigated radiologic technologists' (RTs) prestige ratings of 13 allied health professions and 13 general occupations selected from the original National Opinion Research Center (NORC) list. RTs ranked themselves fifth and on the whole tended to elevate the ratings of the allied health professions. There was a high degree of agreement between RTs' ratings and the NORC occupations data. Implications for the RT profession and for future research are noted.",

author = "Glazer-Waldman, {H. R.} and Parker, {H. J.} and F. Chan",

year = "1989",

month = may,

day = "1",

language = "English",

volume = "60",

pages = "419--423",

journal = "Radiologic Technology",

issn = "0033-8397",

publisher = "Grune And Stratton",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prestige

T2 - radiologic technologists rate themselves and other allied health professionals.

AU - Glazer-Waldman, H. R.

AU - Parker, H. J.

AU - Chan, F.

PY - 1989/5/1

Y1 - 1989/5/1

N2 - This study investigated radiologic technologists' (RTs) prestige ratings of 13 allied health professions and 13 general occupations selected from the original National Opinion Research Center (NORC) list. RTs ranked themselves fifth and on the whole tended to elevate the ratings of the allied health professions. There was a high degree of agreement between RTs' ratings and the NORC occupations data. Implications for the RT profession and for future research are noted.

AB - This study investigated radiologic technologists' (RTs) prestige ratings of 13 allied health professions and 13 general occupations selected from the original National Opinion Research Center (NORC) list. RTs ranked themselves fifth and on the whole tended to elevate the ratings of the allied health professions. There was a high degree of agreement between RTs' ratings and the NORC occupations data. Implications for the RT profession and for future research are noted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024673017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024673017&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2734437

AN - SCOPUS:0024673017

VL - 60

SP - 419

EP - 423

JO - Radiologic Technology

JF - Radiologic Technology

SN - 0033-8397

IS - 5

ER -