Meta-Analysis of the Factor Structures of the Beck Depression Inventory–II

Chiung-jung Huang, Jyun Hong Chen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Two meta-analyses examined the factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II). Study 1, which meta-analyzed 51 studies comprising 62 samples (N = 20,475) providing pattern matrices, determined that the two-factor solution comprising Cognitive and Somatic-Affective factors was supported for the full sample. The two-factor solution was also supported for subgroups of studies. As the factor structure varied somewhat between subgroups of studies, the strength of relationships between scale items and their underlying depressive symptoms varied. Hence, comparisons of mean BDI-II scores across subgroups can be misleading. Study 2 meta-analyzed 13 studies consisting of 16 samples (N = 5,128) providing covariance matrices among the 21 BDI-II items. The two-factor solution was again supported in Study 2. Nevertheless, the existence of a general depression factor was supported by the good fit of the one-factor model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459-472
Number of pages14
JournalAssessment
Volume22
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Aug 21

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Depression

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

@article{8e80d7c2a903496296b775f6a0d87d11,
title = "Meta-Analysis of the Factor Structures of the Beck Depression Inventory–II",
abstract = "Two meta-analyses examined the factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II). Study 1, which meta-analyzed 51 studies comprising 62 samples (N = 20,475) providing pattern matrices, determined that the two-factor solution comprising Cognitive and Somatic-Affective factors was supported for the full sample. The two-factor solution was also supported for subgroups of studies. As the factor structure varied somewhat between subgroups of studies, the strength of relationships between scale items and their underlying depressive symptoms varied. Hence, comparisons of mean BDI-II scores across subgroups can be misleading. Study 2 meta-analyzed 13 studies consisting of 16 samples (N = 5,128) providing covariance matrices among the 21 BDI-II items. The two-factor solution was again supported in Study 2. Nevertheless, the existence of a general depression factor was supported by the good fit of the one-factor model.",
author = "Chiung-jung Huang and Chen, {Jyun Hong}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1177/1073191114548873",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "459--472",
journal = "Assessment",
issn = "1073-1911",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Meta-Analysis of the Factor Structures of the Beck Depression Inventory–II. / Huang, Chiung-jung; Chen, Jyun Hong.

In: Assessment, Vol. 22, No. 4, 21.08.2015, p. 459-472.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Meta-Analysis of the Factor Structures of the Beck Depression Inventory–II

AU - Huang, Chiung-jung

AU - Chen, Jyun Hong

PY - 2015/8/21

Y1 - 2015/8/21

N2 - Two meta-analyses examined the factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II). Study 1, which meta-analyzed 51 studies comprising 62 samples (N = 20,475) providing pattern matrices, determined that the two-factor solution comprising Cognitive and Somatic-Affective factors was supported for the full sample. The two-factor solution was also supported for subgroups of studies. As the factor structure varied somewhat between subgroups of studies, the strength of relationships between scale items and their underlying depressive symptoms varied. Hence, comparisons of mean BDI-II scores across subgroups can be misleading. Study 2 meta-analyzed 13 studies consisting of 16 samples (N = 5,128) providing covariance matrices among the 21 BDI-II items. The two-factor solution was again supported in Study 2. Nevertheless, the existence of a general depression factor was supported by the good fit of the one-factor model.

AB - Two meta-analyses examined the factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory–II (BDI-II). Study 1, which meta-analyzed 51 studies comprising 62 samples (N = 20,475) providing pattern matrices, determined that the two-factor solution comprising Cognitive and Somatic-Affective factors was supported for the full sample. The two-factor solution was also supported for subgroups of studies. As the factor structure varied somewhat between subgroups of studies, the strength of relationships between scale items and their underlying depressive symptoms varied. Hence, comparisons of mean BDI-II scores across subgroups can be misleading. Study 2 meta-analyzed 13 studies consisting of 16 samples (N = 5,128) providing covariance matrices among the 21 BDI-II items. The two-factor solution was again supported in Study 2. Nevertheless, the existence of a general depression factor was supported by the good fit of the one-factor model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937213986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937213986&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1073191114548873

DO - 10.1177/1073191114548873

M3 - Article

C2 - 25172846

AN - SCOPUS:84937213986

VL - 22

SP - 459

EP - 472

JO - Assessment

JF - Assessment

SN - 1073-1911

IS - 4

ER -