Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA: Characteristics of charging parties

Brian T. McMahon, Richard Roessler, Philip D. Rumrill, Jessica E. Hurley, Steven L. West, Fong Chan, Linnea Carlson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: This article describes findings from a causal comparative study of the characteristics of Charging Parties who filed allegations of Hiring discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) between 1992 and 2005. Methods: Charging Party Characteristics derived from 19,527 closed Hiring allegations are compared and contrasted to 259,680 closed allegations aggregated from six other prevalent forms of discrimination including Discharge and Constructive Discharge, Reasonable Accommodation, Disability Harassment and Intimidation, and Terms and Conditions of Employment. Tests of Proportion distributed as chi-square are used to form comparisons along a variety of factors including age, gender, impairment, and ethnicity. Results: Most allegations of ADA job discrimination fall into the realm of job retention and career advancement as opposed to job acquisition. Hiring allegations, however, tend to be filed by Charging Parties who are disproportionately male, younger or older applicants, white, and coping with physical or sensory disabilities. Conclusion: Prevailing theories about stigma suggest that negative attitudes are more prevalent toward persons with behavioral disabilities. However, this study provides clear evidence that one behavioral manifestation of negative attitudes, Hiring discrimination, is more often directed at persons with physical or sensory impairments. More outreach regarding ADA rights appears indicated for individuals who share the aforementioned characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-132
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Disabled Persons
Age Factors

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

McMahon, Brian T. ; Roessler, Richard ; Rumrill, Philip D. ; Hurley, Jessica E. ; West, Steven L. ; Chan, Fong ; Carlson, Linnea. / Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA : Characteristics of charging parties. In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2008 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 122-132.
@article{aee3c41ef63f4ed0975f1721a3becbb7,
title = "Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA: Characteristics of charging parties",
abstract = "Introduction: This article describes findings from a causal comparative study of the characteristics of Charging Parties who filed allegations of Hiring discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) between 1992 and 2005. Methods: Charging Party Characteristics derived from 19,527 closed Hiring allegations are compared and contrasted to 259,680 closed allegations aggregated from six other prevalent forms of discrimination including Discharge and Constructive Discharge, Reasonable Accommodation, Disability Harassment and Intimidation, and Terms and Conditions of Employment. Tests of Proportion distributed as chi-square are used to form comparisons along a variety of factors including age, gender, impairment, and ethnicity. Results: Most allegations of ADA job discrimination fall into the realm of job retention and career advancement as opposed to job acquisition. Hiring allegations, however, tend to be filed by Charging Parties who are disproportionately male, younger or older applicants, white, and coping with physical or sensory disabilities. Conclusion: Prevailing theories about stigma suggest that negative attitudes are more prevalent toward persons with behavioral disabilities. However, this study provides clear evidence that one behavioral manifestation of negative attitudes, Hiring discrimination, is more often directed at persons with physical or sensory impairments. More outreach regarding ADA rights appears indicated for individuals who share the aforementioned characteristics.",
author = "McMahon, {Brian T.} and Richard Roessler and Rumrill, {Philip D.} and Hurley, {Jessica E.} and West, {Steven L.} and Fong Chan and Linnea Carlson",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-008-9133-4",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "122--132",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA : Characteristics of charging parties. / McMahon, Brian T.; Roessler, Richard; Rumrill, Philip D.; Hurley, Jessica E.; West, Steven L.; Chan, Fong; Carlson, Linnea.

In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.06.2008, p. 122-132.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA

T2 - Characteristics of charging parties

AU - McMahon, Brian T.

AU - Roessler, Richard

AU - Rumrill, Philip D.

AU - Hurley, Jessica E.

AU - West, Steven L.

AU - Chan, Fong

AU - Carlson, Linnea

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - Introduction: This article describes findings from a causal comparative study of the characteristics of Charging Parties who filed allegations of Hiring discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) between 1992 and 2005. Methods: Charging Party Characteristics derived from 19,527 closed Hiring allegations are compared and contrasted to 259,680 closed allegations aggregated from six other prevalent forms of discrimination including Discharge and Constructive Discharge, Reasonable Accommodation, Disability Harassment and Intimidation, and Terms and Conditions of Employment. Tests of Proportion distributed as chi-square are used to form comparisons along a variety of factors including age, gender, impairment, and ethnicity. Results: Most allegations of ADA job discrimination fall into the realm of job retention and career advancement as opposed to job acquisition. Hiring allegations, however, tend to be filed by Charging Parties who are disproportionately male, younger or older applicants, white, and coping with physical or sensory disabilities. Conclusion: Prevailing theories about stigma suggest that negative attitudes are more prevalent toward persons with behavioral disabilities. However, this study provides clear evidence that one behavioral manifestation of negative attitudes, Hiring discrimination, is more often directed at persons with physical or sensory impairments. More outreach regarding ADA rights appears indicated for individuals who share the aforementioned characteristics.

AB - Introduction: This article describes findings from a causal comparative study of the characteristics of Charging Parties who filed allegations of Hiring discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) between 1992 and 2005. Methods: Charging Party Characteristics derived from 19,527 closed Hiring allegations are compared and contrasted to 259,680 closed allegations aggregated from six other prevalent forms of discrimination including Discharge and Constructive Discharge, Reasonable Accommodation, Disability Harassment and Intimidation, and Terms and Conditions of Employment. Tests of Proportion distributed as chi-square are used to form comparisons along a variety of factors including age, gender, impairment, and ethnicity. Results: Most allegations of ADA job discrimination fall into the realm of job retention and career advancement as opposed to job acquisition. Hiring allegations, however, tend to be filed by Charging Parties who are disproportionately male, younger or older applicants, white, and coping with physical or sensory disabilities. Conclusion: Prevailing theories about stigma suggest that negative attitudes are more prevalent toward persons with behavioral disabilities. However, this study provides clear evidence that one behavioral manifestation of negative attitudes, Hiring discrimination, is more often directed at persons with physical or sensory impairments. More outreach regarding ADA rights appears indicated for individuals who share the aforementioned characteristics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43849104169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43849104169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-008-9133-4

DO - 10.1007/s10926-008-9133-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 18431547

AN - SCOPUS:43849104169

VL - 18

SP - 122

EP - 132

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 2

ER -