Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA

Characteristics of employers

Brian T. McMahon, Philip D. Rumrill, Richard Roessler, Jessica E. Hurley, Steven L. West, Fong Chan, Linnea Carlson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: This article describes findings from a causal comparative study of the characteristics of employers against whom allegations of hiring discrimination were filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) between 1992 and 2005. Methods: Employer characteristics derived from 19,527 closed Hiring allegations are compared and contrasted to 259,680 closed allegations aggregated from six other prevalent forms of discrimination including Discharge and Constructive Discharge, Reasonable Accommodation, Disability Harassment and Intimidation, and Terms and Conditions of Employment. Tests of Proportion distributed as chi-square are used to form comparisons along a variety of factors including industry classification, size of workforce, and location. Results: As compared to non-hiring allegations, hiring allegations were more likely to be filed against employers with 15-100 employees, in the West U.S. Census track region, or in industries including educational services; public administration; transportation and warehousing; professional, scientific, and technical services; agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting; and construction. Conclusion: More outreach regarding ADA responsibilities appears indicated for those employers who share the aforementioned characteristics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)112-121
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Disabled Persons
Industry
Forestry
Censuses
Agriculture

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

McMahon, Brian T. ; Rumrill, Philip D. ; Roessler, Richard ; Hurley, Jessica E. ; West, Steven L. ; Chan, Fong ; Carlson, Linnea. / Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA : Characteristics of employers. In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2008 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 112-121.
@article{2e8bf4b0675d487a9c24a2adb98c6a4c,
title = "Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA: Characteristics of employers",
abstract = "Introduction: This article describes findings from a causal comparative study of the characteristics of employers against whom allegations of hiring discrimination were filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) between 1992 and 2005. Methods: Employer characteristics derived from 19,527 closed Hiring allegations are compared and contrasted to 259,680 closed allegations aggregated from six other prevalent forms of discrimination including Discharge and Constructive Discharge, Reasonable Accommodation, Disability Harassment and Intimidation, and Terms and Conditions of Employment. Tests of Proportion distributed as chi-square are used to form comparisons along a variety of factors including industry classification, size of workforce, and location. Results: As compared to non-hiring allegations, hiring allegations were more likely to be filed against employers with 15-100 employees, in the West U.S. Census track region, or in industries including educational services; public administration; transportation and warehousing; professional, scientific, and technical services; agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting; and construction. Conclusion: More outreach regarding ADA responsibilities appears indicated for those employers who share the aforementioned characteristics.",
author = "McMahon, {Brian T.} and Rumrill, {Philip D.} and Richard Roessler and Hurley, {Jessica E.} and West, {Steven L.} and Fong Chan and Linnea Carlson",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-008-9134-3",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "112--121",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA : Characteristics of employers. / McMahon, Brian T.; Rumrill, Philip D.; Roessler, Richard; Hurley, Jessica E.; West, Steven L.; Chan, Fong; Carlson, Linnea.

In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.06.2008, p. 112-121.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hiring discrimination against people with disabilities under the ADA

T2 - Characteristics of employers

AU - McMahon, Brian T.

AU - Rumrill, Philip D.

AU - Roessler, Richard

AU - Hurley, Jessica E.

AU - West, Steven L.

AU - Chan, Fong

AU - Carlson, Linnea

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - Introduction: This article describes findings from a causal comparative study of the characteristics of employers against whom allegations of hiring discrimination were filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) between 1992 and 2005. Methods: Employer characteristics derived from 19,527 closed Hiring allegations are compared and contrasted to 259,680 closed allegations aggregated from six other prevalent forms of discrimination including Discharge and Constructive Discharge, Reasonable Accommodation, Disability Harassment and Intimidation, and Terms and Conditions of Employment. Tests of Proportion distributed as chi-square are used to form comparisons along a variety of factors including industry classification, size of workforce, and location. Results: As compared to non-hiring allegations, hiring allegations were more likely to be filed against employers with 15-100 employees, in the West U.S. Census track region, or in industries including educational services; public administration; transportation and warehousing; professional, scientific, and technical services; agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting; and construction. Conclusion: More outreach regarding ADA responsibilities appears indicated for those employers who share the aforementioned characteristics.

AB - Introduction: This article describes findings from a causal comparative study of the characteristics of employers against whom allegations of hiring discrimination were filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) between 1992 and 2005. Methods: Employer characteristics derived from 19,527 closed Hiring allegations are compared and contrasted to 259,680 closed allegations aggregated from six other prevalent forms of discrimination including Discharge and Constructive Discharge, Reasonable Accommodation, Disability Harassment and Intimidation, and Terms and Conditions of Employment. Tests of Proportion distributed as chi-square are used to form comparisons along a variety of factors including industry classification, size of workforce, and location. Results: As compared to non-hiring allegations, hiring allegations were more likely to be filed against employers with 15-100 employees, in the West U.S. Census track region, or in industries including educational services; public administration; transportation and warehousing; professional, scientific, and technical services; agriculture, forestry, fishing, and hunting; and construction. Conclusion: More outreach regarding ADA responsibilities appears indicated for those employers who share the aforementioned characteristics.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43849089614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43849089614&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-008-9134-3

DO - 10.1007/s10926-008-9134-3

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 112

EP - 121

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 2

ER -