Hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges

The impact of individual factors

Tsung-Chih Wu, Chi Hsiang Chen, Nai Wen Yi, Pei Chen Lu, Shan Chi Yu, Chien Peng Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizational factors/individual factors on SPs’ perception of frequency of hazard management. The researchers conducted survey research to achieve the objective of this study. The researchers mailed questionnaires to 200 SPs in colleges after simple random sampling, then received a total of 144 valid responses (response rate = 72%). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the hazard management scale (HMS) extracted five factors, including physical hazards, biological hazards, social and psychological hazards, ergonomic hazards, and chemical hazards. Moreover, the top 10 hazards that the survey results identified that safety professionals were most likely to deal with (in order of most to least frequent) were: organic solvents, illumination, other chemicals, machinery and equipment, fire and explosion, electricity, noise, specific chemicals, human error, and lifting/carrying. Finally, the results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated there were four individual factors that impacted the perceived frequency of hazard management which were of statistical and practical significance: job tenure in the college of employment, type of certification, gender, and overall job tenure. SPs within colleges and industries can now discuss plans revolving around these five areas instead of having to deal with all of the separate hazards.

Original languageEnglish
Article number1201
JournalInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Volume13
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Dec 3

Fingerprint

Safety Management
Safety
Research Personnel
Electricity
Human Engineering
Explosions
Certification
Lighting
Workplace
Statistical Factor Analysis
Noise
Analysis of Variance
Industry
Multivariate Analysis
Psychology
Equipment and Supplies
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Cite this

Wu, Tsung-Chih ; Chen, Chi Hsiang ; Yi, Nai Wen ; Lu, Pei Chen ; Yu, Shan Chi ; Wang, Chien Peng. / Hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges : The impact of individual factors. In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2016 ; Vol. 13, No. 12.
@article{c0aa17d22fe6426588fda536d6a3fe52,
title = "Hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges: The impact of individual factors",
abstract = "Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizational factors/individual factors on SPs’ perception of frequency of hazard management. The researchers conducted survey research to achieve the objective of this study. The researchers mailed questionnaires to 200 SPs in colleges after simple random sampling, then received a total of 144 valid responses (response rate = 72{\%}). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the hazard management scale (HMS) extracted five factors, including physical hazards, biological hazards, social and psychological hazards, ergonomic hazards, and chemical hazards. Moreover, the top 10 hazards that the survey results identified that safety professionals were most likely to deal with (in order of most to least frequent) were: organic solvents, illumination, other chemicals, machinery and equipment, fire and explosion, electricity, noise, specific chemicals, human error, and lifting/carrying. Finally, the results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated there were four individual factors that impacted the perceived frequency of hazard management which were of statistical and practical significance: job tenure in the college of employment, type of certification, gender, and overall job tenure. SPs within colleges and industries can now discuss plans revolving around these five areas instead of having to deal with all of the separate hazards.",
author = "Tsung-Chih Wu and Chen, {Chi Hsiang} and Yi, {Nai Wen} and Lu, {Pei Chen} and Yu, {Shan Chi} and Wang, {Chien Peng}",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "3",
doi = "10.3390/ijerph13121201",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health",
issn = "1661-7827",
publisher = "Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)",
number = "12",

}

Hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges : The impact of individual factors. / Wu, Tsung-Chih; Chen, Chi Hsiang; Yi, Nai Wen; Lu, Pei Chen; Yu, Shan Chi; Wang, Chien Peng.

In: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 13, No. 12, 1201, 03.12.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges

T2 - The impact of individual factors

AU - Wu, Tsung-Chih

AU - Chen, Chi Hsiang

AU - Yi, Nai Wen

AU - Lu, Pei Chen

AU - Yu, Shan Chi

AU - Wang, Chien Peng

PY - 2016/12/3

Y1 - 2016/12/3

N2 - Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizational factors/individual factors on SPs’ perception of frequency of hazard management. The researchers conducted survey research to achieve the objective of this study. The researchers mailed questionnaires to 200 SPs in colleges after simple random sampling, then received a total of 144 valid responses (response rate = 72%). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the hazard management scale (HMS) extracted five factors, including physical hazards, biological hazards, social and psychological hazards, ergonomic hazards, and chemical hazards. Moreover, the top 10 hazards that the survey results identified that safety professionals were most likely to deal with (in order of most to least frequent) were: organic solvents, illumination, other chemicals, machinery and equipment, fire and explosion, electricity, noise, specific chemicals, human error, and lifting/carrying. Finally, the results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated there were four individual factors that impacted the perceived frequency of hazard management which were of statistical and practical significance: job tenure in the college of employment, type of certification, gender, and overall job tenure. SPs within colleges and industries can now discuss plans revolving around these five areas instead of having to deal with all of the separate hazards.

AB - Identifying, evaluating, and controlling workplace hazards are important functions of safety professionals (SPs). The purpose of this study was to investigate the content and frequency of hazard management dealt by safety professionals in colleges. The authors also explored the effects of organizational factors/individual factors on SPs’ perception of frequency of hazard management. The researchers conducted survey research to achieve the objective of this study. The researchers mailed questionnaires to 200 SPs in colleges after simple random sampling, then received a total of 144 valid responses (response rate = 72%). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the hazard management scale (HMS) extracted five factors, including physical hazards, biological hazards, social and psychological hazards, ergonomic hazards, and chemical hazards. Moreover, the top 10 hazards that the survey results identified that safety professionals were most likely to deal with (in order of most to least frequent) were: organic solvents, illumination, other chemicals, machinery and equipment, fire and explosion, electricity, noise, specific chemicals, human error, and lifting/carrying. Finally, the results of one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated there were four individual factors that impacted the perceived frequency of hazard management which were of statistical and practical significance: job tenure in the college of employment, type of certification, gender, and overall job tenure. SPs within colleges and industries can now discuss plans revolving around these five areas instead of having to deal with all of the separate hazards.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85003632948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85003632948&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/ijerph13121201

DO - 10.3390/ijerph13121201

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

SN - 1661-7827

IS - 12

M1 - 1201

ER -