Abstract
The importance of job functions and knowledge domains to the practice of disability management was examined by systematically obtaining the opinions of a panel of 44 recognized experts in disability management. As proposed by Habeck and Kirchner (1999), disability management was conceptualized at two levels of practice. Level I (DM) was defined as administrative and managerial in nature, with an organizational focus. Level II (dm) was conceptualized as human-service oriented, involving the direct provision of services to individual clients. The results indicated that many functions and knowledge domains that appear to be generally important to disability management practice, while others appear to have greater or lesser salience depending on whether services are focused at the organizational or individual level of intervention.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 133-143 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2001 Jan 1 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Rehabilitation
- Applied Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Cite this
}
Functions and Knowledge Domains for Disability Management Practice : A Delphi Study. / Currier, Kenneth F.; Chan, Fong; Berven, Norman L.; Habeck, Rochelle V.; Taylor, Darrell W.
In: Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.01.2001, p. 133-143.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Functions and Knowledge Domains for Disability Management Practice
T2 - A Delphi Study
AU - Currier, Kenneth F.
AU - Chan, Fong
AU - Berven, Norman L.
AU - Habeck, Rochelle V.
AU - Taylor, Darrell W.
PY - 2001/1/1
Y1 - 2001/1/1
N2 - The importance of job functions and knowledge domains to the practice of disability management was examined by systematically obtaining the opinions of a panel of 44 recognized experts in disability management. As proposed by Habeck and Kirchner (1999), disability management was conceptualized at two levels of practice. Level I (DM) was defined as administrative and managerial in nature, with an organizational focus. Level II (dm) was conceptualized as human-service oriented, involving the direct provision of services to individual clients. The results indicated that many functions and knowledge domains that appear to be generally important to disability management practice, while others appear to have greater or lesser salience depending on whether services are focused at the organizational or individual level of intervention.
AB - The importance of job functions and knowledge domains to the practice of disability management was examined by systematically obtaining the opinions of a panel of 44 recognized experts in disability management. As proposed by Habeck and Kirchner (1999), disability management was conceptualized at two levels of practice. Level I (DM) was defined as administrative and managerial in nature, with an organizational focus. Level II (dm) was conceptualized as human-service oriented, involving the direct provision of services to individual clients. The results indicated that many functions and knowledge domains that appear to be generally important to disability management practice, while others appear to have greater or lesser salience depending on whether services are focused at the organizational or individual level of intervention.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035607463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035607463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/003435520104400303
DO - 10.1177/003435520104400303
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0035607463
VL - 44
SP - 133
EP - 143
JO - Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin
JF - Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin
SN - 0034-3552
IS - 3
ER -