Explicit and implicit team coordination: Development of a multidimensional scale

Huo-Tsan Chang, Cheng Chen Lin, Cheng Hung Chen, Yeong Ho Ho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We reviewed team coordination and implicit coordination theories and developed an explicit and implicit team coordination scale. After item revision of a preliminary scale had been performed by 5 experts, there were 30 items in 6 dimensions classified as explicit accountability, explicit predictability, explicit common understanding, implicit accountability, implicit predictability, and implicit common understanding. The reliability and validity of these items were determined with 323 participants, after which exploratory factor analysis resulted in 5 valid dimensions: explicit accountability, implicit accountability, explicit predictability, implicit predictability, and common understanding, comprising 26 items in the multidimensional scale. Future researchers can further explore the applicability of the scale for measuring team coordination in team management practices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)915-929
Number of pages15
JournalSocial Behavior and Personality
Volume45
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Aug 2

Fingerprint

Social Responsibility
Practice Management
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical Factor Analysis
Research Personnel

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Chang, Huo-Tsan ; Lin, Cheng Chen ; Chen, Cheng Hung ; Ho, Yeong Ho. / Explicit and implicit team coordination : Development of a multidimensional scale. In: Social Behavior and Personality. 2017 ; Vol. 45, No. 6. pp. 915-929.
@article{1eaaf4cbc5be434f9d910e64ba8184fd,
title = "Explicit and implicit team coordination: Development of a multidimensional scale",
abstract = "We reviewed team coordination and implicit coordination theories and developed an explicit and implicit team coordination scale. After item revision of a preliminary scale had been performed by 5 experts, there were 30 items in 6 dimensions classified as explicit accountability, explicit predictability, explicit common understanding, implicit accountability, implicit predictability, and implicit common understanding. The reliability and validity of these items were determined with 323 participants, after which exploratory factor analysis resulted in 5 valid dimensions: explicit accountability, implicit accountability, explicit predictability, implicit predictability, and common understanding, comprising 26 items in the multidimensional scale. Future researchers can further explore the applicability of the scale for measuring team coordination in team management practices.",
author = "Huo-Tsan Chang and Lin, {Cheng Chen} and Chen, {Cheng Hung} and Ho, {Yeong Ho}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "2",
doi = "10.2224/sbp.5893",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "915--929",
journal = "Social Behavior and Personality",
issn = "0301-2212",
publisher = "Society for Personal Research",
number = "6",

}

Explicit and implicit team coordination : Development of a multidimensional scale. / Chang, Huo-Tsan; Lin, Cheng Chen; Chen, Cheng Hung; Ho, Yeong Ho.

In: Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 45, No. 6, 02.08.2017, p. 915-929.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explicit and implicit team coordination

T2 - Development of a multidimensional scale

AU - Chang, Huo-Tsan

AU - Lin, Cheng Chen

AU - Chen, Cheng Hung

AU - Ho, Yeong Ho

PY - 2017/8/2

Y1 - 2017/8/2

N2 - We reviewed team coordination and implicit coordination theories and developed an explicit and implicit team coordination scale. After item revision of a preliminary scale had been performed by 5 experts, there were 30 items in 6 dimensions classified as explicit accountability, explicit predictability, explicit common understanding, implicit accountability, implicit predictability, and implicit common understanding. The reliability and validity of these items were determined with 323 participants, after which exploratory factor analysis resulted in 5 valid dimensions: explicit accountability, implicit accountability, explicit predictability, implicit predictability, and common understanding, comprising 26 items in the multidimensional scale. Future researchers can further explore the applicability of the scale for measuring team coordination in team management practices.

AB - We reviewed team coordination and implicit coordination theories and developed an explicit and implicit team coordination scale. After item revision of a preliminary scale had been performed by 5 experts, there were 30 items in 6 dimensions classified as explicit accountability, explicit predictability, explicit common understanding, implicit accountability, implicit predictability, and implicit common understanding. The reliability and validity of these items were determined with 323 participants, after which exploratory factor analysis resulted in 5 valid dimensions: explicit accountability, implicit accountability, explicit predictability, implicit predictability, and common understanding, comprising 26 items in the multidimensional scale. Future researchers can further explore the applicability of the scale for measuring team coordination in team management practices.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026828361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026828361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2224/sbp.5893

DO - 10.2224/sbp.5893

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85026828361

VL - 45

SP - 915

EP - 929

JO - Social Behavior and Personality

JF - Social Behavior and Personality

SN - 0301-2212

IS - 6

ER -