Abstract
We reviewed team coordination and implicit coordination theories and developed an explicit and implicit team coordination scale. After item revision of a preliminary scale had been performed by 5 experts, there were 30 items in 6 dimensions classified as explicit accountability, explicit predictability, explicit common understanding, implicit accountability, implicit predictability, and implicit common understanding. The reliability and validity of these items were determined with 323 participants, after which exploratory factor analysis resulted in 5 valid dimensions: explicit accountability, implicit accountability, explicit predictability, implicit predictability, and common understanding, comprising 26 items in the multidimensional scale. Future researchers can further explore the applicability of the scale for measuring team coordination in team management practices.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 915-929 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Social Behavior and Personality |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 Aug 2 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Social Psychology
Cite this
}
Explicit and implicit team coordination : Development of a multidimensional scale. / Chang, Huo-Tsan; Lin, Cheng Chen; Chen, Cheng Hung; Ho, Yeong Ho.
In: Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 45, No. 6, 02.08.2017, p. 915-929.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Explicit and implicit team coordination
T2 - Development of a multidimensional scale
AU - Chang, Huo-Tsan
AU - Lin, Cheng Chen
AU - Chen, Cheng Hung
AU - Ho, Yeong Ho
PY - 2017/8/2
Y1 - 2017/8/2
N2 - We reviewed team coordination and implicit coordination theories and developed an explicit and implicit team coordination scale. After item revision of a preliminary scale had been performed by 5 experts, there were 30 items in 6 dimensions classified as explicit accountability, explicit predictability, explicit common understanding, implicit accountability, implicit predictability, and implicit common understanding. The reliability and validity of these items were determined with 323 participants, after which exploratory factor analysis resulted in 5 valid dimensions: explicit accountability, implicit accountability, explicit predictability, implicit predictability, and common understanding, comprising 26 items in the multidimensional scale. Future researchers can further explore the applicability of the scale for measuring team coordination in team management practices.
AB - We reviewed team coordination and implicit coordination theories and developed an explicit and implicit team coordination scale. After item revision of a preliminary scale had been performed by 5 experts, there were 30 items in 6 dimensions classified as explicit accountability, explicit predictability, explicit common understanding, implicit accountability, implicit predictability, and implicit common understanding. The reliability and validity of these items were determined with 323 participants, after which exploratory factor analysis resulted in 5 valid dimensions: explicit accountability, implicit accountability, explicit predictability, implicit predictability, and common understanding, comprising 26 items in the multidimensional scale. Future researchers can further explore the applicability of the scale for measuring team coordination in team management practices.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026828361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026828361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2224/sbp.5893
DO - 10.2224/sbp.5893
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85026828361
VL - 45
SP - 915
EP - 929
JO - Social Behavior and Personality
JF - Social Behavior and Personality
SN - 0301-2212
IS - 6
ER -