Examining Low and Non-low Achievers’ Motivation Towards Science Learning Under Inquiry-Based Instruction

Yen Ruey Kuo, Hsiao-Lin Tuan, Chi Chin Chin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study aimed to explore low and non-low achievers’ motivation towards science learning among 8th graders in two public schools in central Taiwan under inquiry-based instruction. Mixed design research methods were adopted, and students were divided into experimental (n = 56) and control groups (n = 45). Six non-consecutive inquiry units (90–180 minutes each) were taught to the experimental group during one semester, while same topic units were instructed traditionally in the control group. A questionnaire measuring students’ motivation towards science learning [MILS] was implemented as pre- and post-tests in both the experimental and control groups. Moreover, the teachers and 12 non-low achievers, and six low achievers from each group were interviewed four times in this semester. ANCOVA were used to analyze quantitative data in the questionnaire, and the interview data were coded. The results showed that statistically non-low achievers’ achievement goals and perception of their learning environment in the experimental group significantly improved more than those in the control group. Practically, non-low achievers’ expectancy and learning strategies and low achievers’ confidence, value of science learning, achievement goals, learning strategies, and perception of learning environment in the experimental group were better than those in the control group. Low achievers still needed to use more learning strategies. Additionally, in the experimental group, hands-on activities and conceptual understanding motivated both achievers, various learning strategies motivated non-low achievers, and teachers and peers’ assistance motivated low achievers. However, both achievers under intervention had more exam anxiety than those under traditional teaching due to their weak ability to calculate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)845-862
Number of pages18
JournalInternational Journal of Science and Mathematics Education
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019 Jun 15

Fingerprint

instruction
science
Learning Strategies
learning
learning strategy
Group
Learning Environment
Questionnaire
semester
learning environment
Learning
Analysis of Covariance
Pre-test
Anxiety
Unit
Research Methods
questionnaire
Taiwan
teacher
Design Method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Mathematics(all)

Cite this

@article{0203fdb5219d43b6887d1e3c2a7c9fd4,
title = "Examining Low and Non-low Achievers’ Motivation Towards Science Learning Under Inquiry-Based Instruction",
abstract = "This study aimed to explore low and non-low achievers’ motivation towards science learning among 8th graders in two public schools in central Taiwan under inquiry-based instruction. Mixed design research methods were adopted, and students were divided into experimental (n = 56) and control groups (n = 45). Six non-consecutive inquiry units (90–180 minutes each) were taught to the experimental group during one semester, while same topic units were instructed traditionally in the control group. A questionnaire measuring students’ motivation towards science learning [MILS] was implemented as pre- and post-tests in both the experimental and control groups. Moreover, the teachers and 12 non-low achievers, and six low achievers from each group were interviewed four times in this semester. ANCOVA were used to analyze quantitative data in the questionnaire, and the interview data were coded. The results showed that statistically non-low achievers’ achievement goals and perception of their learning environment in the experimental group significantly improved more than those in the control group. Practically, non-low achievers’ expectancy and learning strategies and low achievers’ confidence, value of science learning, achievement goals, learning strategies, and perception of learning environment in the experimental group were better than those in the control group. Low achievers still needed to use more learning strategies. Additionally, in the experimental group, hands-on activities and conceptual understanding motivated both achievers, various learning strategies motivated non-low achievers, and teachers and peers’ assistance motivated low achievers. However, both achievers under intervention had more exam anxiety than those under traditional teaching due to their weak ability to calculate.",
author = "Kuo, {Yen Ruey} and Hsiao-Lin Tuan and Chin, {Chi Chin}",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10763-018-9908-9",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "845--862",
journal = "International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education",
issn = "1571-0068",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "5",

}

Examining Low and Non-low Achievers’ Motivation Towards Science Learning Under Inquiry-Based Instruction. / Kuo, Yen Ruey; Tuan, Hsiao-Lin; Chin, Chi Chin.

In: International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 17, No. 5, 15.06.2019, p. 845-862.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining Low and Non-low Achievers’ Motivation Towards Science Learning Under Inquiry-Based Instruction

AU - Kuo, Yen Ruey

AU - Tuan, Hsiao-Lin

AU - Chin, Chi Chin

PY - 2019/6/15

Y1 - 2019/6/15

N2 - This study aimed to explore low and non-low achievers’ motivation towards science learning among 8th graders in two public schools in central Taiwan under inquiry-based instruction. Mixed design research methods were adopted, and students were divided into experimental (n = 56) and control groups (n = 45). Six non-consecutive inquiry units (90–180 minutes each) were taught to the experimental group during one semester, while same topic units were instructed traditionally in the control group. A questionnaire measuring students’ motivation towards science learning [MILS] was implemented as pre- and post-tests in both the experimental and control groups. Moreover, the teachers and 12 non-low achievers, and six low achievers from each group were interviewed four times in this semester. ANCOVA were used to analyze quantitative data in the questionnaire, and the interview data were coded. The results showed that statistically non-low achievers’ achievement goals and perception of their learning environment in the experimental group significantly improved more than those in the control group. Practically, non-low achievers’ expectancy and learning strategies and low achievers’ confidence, value of science learning, achievement goals, learning strategies, and perception of learning environment in the experimental group were better than those in the control group. Low achievers still needed to use more learning strategies. Additionally, in the experimental group, hands-on activities and conceptual understanding motivated both achievers, various learning strategies motivated non-low achievers, and teachers and peers’ assistance motivated low achievers. However, both achievers under intervention had more exam anxiety than those under traditional teaching due to their weak ability to calculate.

AB - This study aimed to explore low and non-low achievers’ motivation towards science learning among 8th graders in two public schools in central Taiwan under inquiry-based instruction. Mixed design research methods were adopted, and students were divided into experimental (n = 56) and control groups (n = 45). Six non-consecutive inquiry units (90–180 minutes each) were taught to the experimental group during one semester, while same topic units were instructed traditionally in the control group. A questionnaire measuring students’ motivation towards science learning [MILS] was implemented as pre- and post-tests in both the experimental and control groups. Moreover, the teachers and 12 non-low achievers, and six low achievers from each group were interviewed four times in this semester. ANCOVA were used to analyze quantitative data in the questionnaire, and the interview data were coded. The results showed that statistically non-low achievers’ achievement goals and perception of their learning environment in the experimental group significantly improved more than those in the control group. Practically, non-low achievers’ expectancy and learning strategies and low achievers’ confidence, value of science learning, achievement goals, learning strategies, and perception of learning environment in the experimental group were better than those in the control group. Low achievers still needed to use more learning strategies. Additionally, in the experimental group, hands-on activities and conceptual understanding motivated both achievers, various learning strategies motivated non-low achievers, and teachers and peers’ assistance motivated low achievers. However, both achievers under intervention had more exam anxiety than those under traditional teaching due to their weak ability to calculate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048874453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048874453&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10763-018-9908-9

DO - 10.1007/s10763-018-9908-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048874453

VL - 17

SP - 845

EP - 862

JO - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

JF - International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education

SN - 1571-0068

IS - 5

ER -