Evaluation of ANN and SVM classifiers as predictors to the diagnosis of students with learning disabilities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Due to the implicit characteristics of learning disabilities (LD), the identification or diagnosis of students with learning disabilities has long been a difficult issue. The LD diagnosis procedure usually involves interpreting some standard tests or checklist scores and comparing them to norms that are derived from statistical method. In this paper, we apply two well-known artificial intelligence techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM), to the LD diagnosis problem. To improve the overall identification accuracy, we also experiment with GA-based feature selection algorithms as the pre-processing step. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt in applying ANN or SVM to similar application. The experimental results show that ANN in general performs better than SVM in this application, and the wrapper-based GA feature selection procedure can improve the LD identification accuracy, and among all, the combination of using SVM learner in the feature selection procedure and ANN learner in the classification stage results in feature set that achieves the best prediction accuracy. Most important of all, the study indicates that the ANN classifier can correctly identify up to 50% of the LD students with 100% confidence, which is much better than currently used LD diagnosis predictors derived through the statistical method. Consequently, a properly trained ANN classification model can be a strong predictor for use in the LD diagnosis procedure. Furthermore, a well-trained ANN model can also be used to verify whether a LD diagnosis procedure is adequate. In conclusion, we expect that AI techniques like ANN or SVM will certainly play an essential role in future LD diagnosis applications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1846-1856
Number of pages11
JournalExpert Systems with Applications
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Apr 1

Fingerprint

Support vector machines
Classifiers
Students
Neural networks
Feature extraction
Statistical methods
Artificial intelligence
Processing
Experiments

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Engineering(all)
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

@article{6d24fcb91bf3461fac64915467661294,
title = "Evaluation of ANN and SVM classifiers as predictors to the diagnosis of students with learning disabilities",
abstract = "Due to the implicit characteristics of learning disabilities (LD), the identification or diagnosis of students with learning disabilities has long been a difficult issue. The LD diagnosis procedure usually involves interpreting some standard tests or checklist scores and comparing them to norms that are derived from statistical method. In this paper, we apply two well-known artificial intelligence techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM), to the LD diagnosis problem. To improve the overall identification accuracy, we also experiment with GA-based feature selection algorithms as the pre-processing step. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt in applying ANN or SVM to similar application. The experimental results show that ANN in general performs better than SVM in this application, and the wrapper-based GA feature selection procedure can improve the LD identification accuracy, and among all, the combination of using SVM learner in the feature selection procedure and ANN learner in the classification stage results in feature set that achieves the best prediction accuracy. Most important of all, the study indicates that the ANN classifier can correctly identify up to 50{\%} of the LD students with 100{\%} confidence, which is much better than currently used LD diagnosis predictors derived through the statistical method. Consequently, a properly trained ANN classification model can be a strong predictor for use in the LD diagnosis procedure. Furthermore, a well-trained ANN model can also be used to verify whether a LD diagnosis procedure is adequate. In conclusion, we expect that AI techniques like ANN or SVM will certainly play an essential role in future LD diagnosis applications.",
author = "Wu, {Tung Kuang} and Huang, {Shian Chang} and Meng, {Ying Ru}",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.026",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1846--1856",
journal = "Expert Systems with Applications",
issn = "0957-4174",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

Evaluation of ANN and SVM classifiers as predictors to the diagnosis of students with learning disabilities. / Wu, Tung Kuang; Huang, Shian Chang; Meng, Ying Ru.

In: Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 34, No. 3, 01.04.2008, p. 1846-1856.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of ANN and SVM classifiers as predictors to the diagnosis of students with learning disabilities

AU - Wu, Tung Kuang

AU - Huang, Shian Chang

AU - Meng, Ying Ru

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - Due to the implicit characteristics of learning disabilities (LD), the identification or diagnosis of students with learning disabilities has long been a difficult issue. The LD diagnosis procedure usually involves interpreting some standard tests or checklist scores and comparing them to norms that are derived from statistical method. In this paper, we apply two well-known artificial intelligence techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM), to the LD diagnosis problem. To improve the overall identification accuracy, we also experiment with GA-based feature selection algorithms as the pre-processing step. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt in applying ANN or SVM to similar application. The experimental results show that ANN in general performs better than SVM in this application, and the wrapper-based GA feature selection procedure can improve the LD identification accuracy, and among all, the combination of using SVM learner in the feature selection procedure and ANN learner in the classification stage results in feature set that achieves the best prediction accuracy. Most important of all, the study indicates that the ANN classifier can correctly identify up to 50% of the LD students with 100% confidence, which is much better than currently used LD diagnosis predictors derived through the statistical method. Consequently, a properly trained ANN classification model can be a strong predictor for use in the LD diagnosis procedure. Furthermore, a well-trained ANN model can also be used to verify whether a LD diagnosis procedure is adequate. In conclusion, we expect that AI techniques like ANN or SVM will certainly play an essential role in future LD diagnosis applications.

AB - Due to the implicit characteristics of learning disabilities (LD), the identification or diagnosis of students with learning disabilities has long been a difficult issue. The LD diagnosis procedure usually involves interpreting some standard tests or checklist scores and comparing them to norms that are derived from statistical method. In this paper, we apply two well-known artificial intelligence techniques, artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM), to the LD diagnosis problem. To improve the overall identification accuracy, we also experiment with GA-based feature selection algorithms as the pre-processing step. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt in applying ANN or SVM to similar application. The experimental results show that ANN in general performs better than SVM in this application, and the wrapper-based GA feature selection procedure can improve the LD identification accuracy, and among all, the combination of using SVM learner in the feature selection procedure and ANN learner in the classification stage results in feature set that achieves the best prediction accuracy. Most important of all, the study indicates that the ANN classifier can correctly identify up to 50% of the LD students with 100% confidence, which is much better than currently used LD diagnosis predictors derived through the statistical method. Consequently, a properly trained ANN classification model can be a strong predictor for use in the LD diagnosis procedure. Furthermore, a well-trained ANN model can also be used to verify whether a LD diagnosis procedure is adequate. In conclusion, we expect that AI techniques like ANN or SVM will certainly play an essential role in future LD diagnosis applications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37349024110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37349024110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.026

DO - 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.026

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:37349024110

VL - 34

SP - 1846

EP - 1856

JO - Expert Systems with Applications

JF - Expert Systems with Applications

SN - 0957-4174

IS - 3

ER -