Drivers of hiring discrimination for individuals with disabilities

Brian T. McMahon, Jessica E. Hurley, Fong Chan, Philip D. Rumrill, Richard Roessler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Hiring discrimination in the workplace is defined as failure or refusal by an employer to engage a qualified applicant as an employee due to the existence or consequence of disability. The specific intent of this study is to determine what differentiates an allegation (perception of discrimination) from an actual discriminatory event (Merit Resolution). Methods: Researchers used a data-mining approach, the Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID), to examine 19,527 resolved allegations of hiring discrimination in order to differentiate between Merit Resolution and Non-Merit Resolution outcomes. Results: CHAID analysis confirmed that hiring discrimination is a complex matter with a variety of influences. Primary among these is the age of the Charging Party, with younger applicants (16-34) prevailing in their allegations 34% of the time. Within this subgroup, the sequence of predictor variables involves the Charging Party's impairment, followed by the Employer's industry classification. Behavioral disabilities, even among the young, result in generally lower Merit Resolution rates in hiring discrimination. Conclusions: Providers of training and technical assistance regarding hiring and disability may be able to adjust their services accordingly on the basis of findings such as these.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)133-139
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Occupational Rehabilitation
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Jun 1

Fingerprint

Data Mining
Workplace
Industry
Research Personnel
Discrimination (Psychology)

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

McMahon, Brian T. ; Hurley, Jessica E. ; Chan, Fong ; Rumrill, Philip D. ; Roessler, Richard. / Drivers of hiring discrimination for individuals with disabilities. In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2008 ; Vol. 18, No. 2. pp. 133-139.
@article{c83e2ae3afbe426ea3e9394b0336b375,
title = "Drivers of hiring discrimination for individuals with disabilities",
abstract = "Introduction: Hiring discrimination in the workplace is defined as failure or refusal by an employer to engage a qualified applicant as an employee due to the existence or consequence of disability. The specific intent of this study is to determine what differentiates an allegation (perception of discrimination) from an actual discriminatory event (Merit Resolution). Methods: Researchers used a data-mining approach, the Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID), to examine 19,527 resolved allegations of hiring discrimination in order to differentiate between Merit Resolution and Non-Merit Resolution outcomes. Results: CHAID analysis confirmed that hiring discrimination is a complex matter with a variety of influences. Primary among these is the age of the Charging Party, with younger applicants (16-34) prevailing in their allegations 34{\%} of the time. Within this subgroup, the sequence of predictor variables involves the Charging Party's impairment, followed by the Employer's industry classification. Behavioral disabilities, even among the young, result in generally lower Merit Resolution rates in hiring discrimination. Conclusions: Providers of training and technical assistance regarding hiring and disability may be able to adjust their services accordingly on the basis of findings such as these.",
author = "McMahon, {Brian T.} and Hurley, {Jessica E.} and Fong Chan and Rumrill, {Philip D.} and Richard Roessler",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10926-008-9136-1",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "133--139",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1053-0487",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

Drivers of hiring discrimination for individuals with disabilities. / McMahon, Brian T.; Hurley, Jessica E.; Chan, Fong; Rumrill, Philip D.; Roessler, Richard.

In: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, Vol. 18, No. 2, 01.06.2008, p. 133-139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drivers of hiring discrimination for individuals with disabilities

AU - McMahon, Brian T.

AU - Hurley, Jessica E.

AU - Chan, Fong

AU - Rumrill, Philip D.

AU - Roessler, Richard

PY - 2008/6/1

Y1 - 2008/6/1

N2 - Introduction: Hiring discrimination in the workplace is defined as failure or refusal by an employer to engage a qualified applicant as an employee due to the existence or consequence of disability. The specific intent of this study is to determine what differentiates an allegation (perception of discrimination) from an actual discriminatory event (Merit Resolution). Methods: Researchers used a data-mining approach, the Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID), to examine 19,527 resolved allegations of hiring discrimination in order to differentiate between Merit Resolution and Non-Merit Resolution outcomes. Results: CHAID analysis confirmed that hiring discrimination is a complex matter with a variety of influences. Primary among these is the age of the Charging Party, with younger applicants (16-34) prevailing in their allegations 34% of the time. Within this subgroup, the sequence of predictor variables involves the Charging Party's impairment, followed by the Employer's industry classification. Behavioral disabilities, even among the young, result in generally lower Merit Resolution rates in hiring discrimination. Conclusions: Providers of training and technical assistance regarding hiring and disability may be able to adjust their services accordingly on the basis of findings such as these.

AB - Introduction: Hiring discrimination in the workplace is defined as failure or refusal by an employer to engage a qualified applicant as an employee due to the existence or consequence of disability. The specific intent of this study is to determine what differentiates an allegation (perception of discrimination) from an actual discriminatory event (Merit Resolution). Methods: Researchers used a data-mining approach, the Chi-square Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID), to examine 19,527 resolved allegations of hiring discrimination in order to differentiate between Merit Resolution and Non-Merit Resolution outcomes. Results: CHAID analysis confirmed that hiring discrimination is a complex matter with a variety of influences. Primary among these is the age of the Charging Party, with younger applicants (16-34) prevailing in their allegations 34% of the time. Within this subgroup, the sequence of predictor variables involves the Charging Party's impairment, followed by the Employer's industry classification. Behavioral disabilities, even among the young, result in generally lower Merit Resolution rates in hiring discrimination. Conclusions: Providers of training and technical assistance regarding hiring and disability may be able to adjust their services accordingly on the basis of findings such as these.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=43849101086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=43849101086&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10926-008-9136-1

DO - 10.1007/s10926-008-9136-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 18446427

AN - SCOPUS:43849101086

VL - 18

SP - 133

EP - 139

JO - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation

SN - 1053-0487

IS - 2

ER -