Does SFAS no. 151 trigger more overproduction?

Chaur Shiuh Young, chih-wei peng, Chin Chen Chien, Liu Ching Tsai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explores whether SFAS No. 151 affects firms' production-level decisions. Although the change from ARB No. 43 (FASB 1953) to SFAS No. 151 (FASB 2004) seems trivial at first glance, using a sample of U.S. manufacturing firms from the Compustat database (SIC 2, 3) for the period 2003-2008, we document that abnormal production costs significantly increased after SFAS No. 151 became effective in 2005. The empirical evidence substantiates our hypothesis that the explicit expensing and reporting of idle facilities, as stipulated in SFAS No. 151, inadvertently further induces opportunism for excess production. Moreover, we find that firms that have limited options to indulge in accruals management, and those that have pressures to boost income, will have higher excess production after the adoption of SFAS No. 151. Supplementary analyses indicate that our results are robust with regard to controlling for sales manipulation, and to alternative explanations for excess production as well as alternative overproduction measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)121-143
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Management Accounting Research
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Overproduction
Trigger
Manipulation
Empirical evidence
Opportunism
Production cost
Data base
Income
Accruals
Manufacturing firms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business and International Management
  • Accounting

Cite this

Young, Chaur Shiuh ; peng, chih-wei ; Chien, Chin Chen ; Tsai, Liu Ching. / Does SFAS no. 151 trigger more overproduction?. In: Journal of Management Accounting Research. 2014 ; Vol. 26, No. 1. pp. 121-143.
@article{c8d190f54b4540ed81728c8c10ef97ba,
title = "Does SFAS no. 151 trigger more overproduction?",
abstract = "This study explores whether SFAS No. 151 affects firms' production-level decisions. Although the change from ARB No. 43 (FASB 1953) to SFAS No. 151 (FASB 2004) seems trivial at first glance, using a sample of U.S. manufacturing firms from the Compustat database (SIC 2, 3) for the period 2003-2008, we document that abnormal production costs significantly increased after SFAS No. 151 became effective in 2005. The empirical evidence substantiates our hypothesis that the explicit expensing and reporting of idle facilities, as stipulated in SFAS No. 151, inadvertently further induces opportunism for excess production. Moreover, we find that firms that have limited options to indulge in accruals management, and those that have pressures to boost income, will have higher excess production after the adoption of SFAS No. 151. Supplementary analyses indicate that our results are robust with regard to controlling for sales manipulation, and to alternative explanations for excess production as well as alternative overproduction measures.",
author = "Young, {Chaur Shiuh} and chih-wei peng and Chien, {Chin Chen} and Tsai, {Liu Ching}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2308/jmar-50652",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "121--143",
journal = "Journal of Management Accounting Research",
issn = "1049-2127",
publisher = "American Accounting Association",
number = "1",

}

Does SFAS no. 151 trigger more overproduction? / Young, Chaur Shiuh; peng, chih-wei; Chien, Chin Chen; Tsai, Liu Ching.

In: Journal of Management Accounting Research, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 121-143.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does SFAS no. 151 trigger more overproduction?

AU - Young, Chaur Shiuh

AU - peng, chih-wei

AU - Chien, Chin Chen

AU - Tsai, Liu Ching

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - This study explores whether SFAS No. 151 affects firms' production-level decisions. Although the change from ARB No. 43 (FASB 1953) to SFAS No. 151 (FASB 2004) seems trivial at first glance, using a sample of U.S. manufacturing firms from the Compustat database (SIC 2, 3) for the period 2003-2008, we document that abnormal production costs significantly increased after SFAS No. 151 became effective in 2005. The empirical evidence substantiates our hypothesis that the explicit expensing and reporting of idle facilities, as stipulated in SFAS No. 151, inadvertently further induces opportunism for excess production. Moreover, we find that firms that have limited options to indulge in accruals management, and those that have pressures to boost income, will have higher excess production after the adoption of SFAS No. 151. Supplementary analyses indicate that our results are robust with regard to controlling for sales manipulation, and to alternative explanations for excess production as well as alternative overproduction measures.

AB - This study explores whether SFAS No. 151 affects firms' production-level decisions. Although the change from ARB No. 43 (FASB 1953) to SFAS No. 151 (FASB 2004) seems trivial at first glance, using a sample of U.S. manufacturing firms from the Compustat database (SIC 2, 3) for the period 2003-2008, we document that abnormal production costs significantly increased after SFAS No. 151 became effective in 2005. The empirical evidence substantiates our hypothesis that the explicit expensing and reporting of idle facilities, as stipulated in SFAS No. 151, inadvertently further induces opportunism for excess production. Moreover, we find that firms that have limited options to indulge in accruals management, and those that have pressures to boost income, will have higher excess production after the adoption of SFAS No. 151. Supplementary analyses indicate that our results are robust with regard to controlling for sales manipulation, and to alternative explanations for excess production as well as alternative overproduction measures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904091812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904091812&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2308/jmar-50652

DO - 10.2308/jmar-50652

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84904091812

VL - 26

SP - 121

EP - 143

JO - Journal of Management Accounting Research

JF - Journal of Management Accounting Research

SN - 1049-2127

IS - 1

ER -