Dimensionality of the Children’s Depression Inventory: Meta-analysis of Pattern Matrices

Chiungjung Huang, Nianbo Dong

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This meta-analysis of 24 studies, comprising 35 independent samples with 18,099 participants, examined the factor structure of the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). The 5-factor solution involving Somatic Concerns, Externalizing, Negative Self-Concept, Lack of Personal and Social Interest, and Dysphoric Mood was supported for all samples. The 5-factor solution was appropriate for child, adolescent, general, at-risk/clinical, and English-speaking samples, whereas the 4-factor solution was the best for samples using non-English versions of the CDI. As the factor structure varied among study subgroups, the strength of relations between scale items and their underlying depressive symptoms varied. Hence, comparisons of mean CDI scores can be misleading.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1182-1192
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Child and Family Studies
Volume23
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Oct 1

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis
Depression
Equipment and Supplies
self-concept
Self Concept
mood
speaking
adolescent
lack

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

@article{0152956b7dcb4ea7b15abc22a9c0d462,
title = "Dimensionality of the Children’s Depression Inventory: Meta-analysis of Pattern Matrices",
abstract = "This meta-analysis of 24 studies, comprising 35 independent samples with 18,099 participants, examined the factor structure of the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). The 5-factor solution involving Somatic Concerns, Externalizing, Negative Self-Concept, Lack of Personal and Social Interest, and Dysphoric Mood was supported for all samples. The 5-factor solution was appropriate for child, adolescent, general, at-risk/clinical, and English-speaking samples, whereas the 4-factor solution was the best for samples using non-English versions of the CDI. As the factor structure varied among study subgroups, the strength of relations between scale items and their underlying depressive symptoms varied. Hence, comparisons of mean CDI scores can be misleading.",
author = "Chiungjung Huang and Nianbo Dong",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10826-013-9779-1",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "1182--1192",
journal = "Journal of Child and Family Studies",
issn = "1062-1024",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

Dimensionality of the Children’s Depression Inventory : Meta-analysis of Pattern Matrices. / Huang, Chiungjung; Dong, Nianbo.

In: Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 23, No. 7, 01.10.2014, p. 1182-1192.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dimensionality of the Children’s Depression Inventory

T2 - Meta-analysis of Pattern Matrices

AU - Huang, Chiungjung

AU - Dong, Nianbo

PY - 2014/10/1

Y1 - 2014/10/1

N2 - This meta-analysis of 24 studies, comprising 35 independent samples with 18,099 participants, examined the factor structure of the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). The 5-factor solution involving Somatic Concerns, Externalizing, Negative Self-Concept, Lack of Personal and Social Interest, and Dysphoric Mood was supported for all samples. The 5-factor solution was appropriate for child, adolescent, general, at-risk/clinical, and English-speaking samples, whereas the 4-factor solution was the best for samples using non-English versions of the CDI. As the factor structure varied among study subgroups, the strength of relations between scale items and their underlying depressive symptoms varied. Hence, comparisons of mean CDI scores can be misleading.

AB - This meta-analysis of 24 studies, comprising 35 independent samples with 18,099 participants, examined the factor structure of the Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). The 5-factor solution involving Somatic Concerns, Externalizing, Negative Self-Concept, Lack of Personal and Social Interest, and Dysphoric Mood was supported for all samples. The 5-factor solution was appropriate for child, adolescent, general, at-risk/clinical, and English-speaking samples, whereas the 4-factor solution was the best for samples using non-English versions of the CDI. As the factor structure varied among study subgroups, the strength of relations between scale items and their underlying depressive symptoms varied. Hence, comparisons of mean CDI scores can be misleading.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878693789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84878693789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10826-013-9779-1

DO - 10.1007/s10826-013-9779-1

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84878693789

VL - 23

SP - 1182

EP - 1192

JO - Journal of Child and Family Studies

JF - Journal of Child and Family Studies

SN - 1062-1024

IS - 7

ER -