Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education

Hsin Kai Wu, Silvia Wen Yu Lee, Hsin Yi Chang, Jyh Chong Liang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

542 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although augmented reality (AR) has gained much research attention in recent years, the term AR was given different meanings by varying researchers. In this article, we first provide an overview of definitions, taxonomies, and technologies of AR. We argue that viewing AR as a concept rather than a type of technology would be more productive for educators, researchers, and designers. Then we identify certain features and affordances of AR systems and applications. Yet, these compelling features may not be unique to AR applications and can be found in other technological systems or learning environments (e.g., ubiquitous and mobile learning environments). The instructional approach adopted by an AR system and the alignment among technology design, instructional approach, and learning experiences may be more important. Thus, we classify three categories of instructional approaches that emphasize the "roles," "tasks," and "locations," and discuss what and how different categories of AR approaches may help students learn. While AR offers new learning opportunities, it also creates new challenges for educators. We outline technological, pedagogical, learning issues related to the implementation of AR in education. For example, students in AR environments may be cognitively overloaded by the large amount of information they encounter, the multiple technological devices they are required to use, and the complex tasks they have to complete. This article provides possible solutions for some of the challenges and suggests topics and issues for future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-49
Number of pages9
JournalComputers and Education
Volume62
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Augmented reality
Education
education
learning environment
educator
Students
learning
Taxonomies
taxonomy
student

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Education

Cite this

Wu, Hsin Kai ; Lee, Silvia Wen Yu ; Chang, Hsin Yi ; Liang, Jyh Chong. / Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. In: Computers and Education. 2013 ; Vol. 62. pp. 41-49.
@article{6d98d7dcb6e647b9b59fe686f88055ef,
title = "Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education",
abstract = "Although augmented reality (AR) has gained much research attention in recent years, the term AR was given different meanings by varying researchers. In this article, we first provide an overview of definitions, taxonomies, and technologies of AR. We argue that viewing AR as a concept rather than a type of technology would be more productive for educators, researchers, and designers. Then we identify certain features and affordances of AR systems and applications. Yet, these compelling features may not be unique to AR applications and can be found in other technological systems or learning environments (e.g., ubiquitous and mobile learning environments). The instructional approach adopted by an AR system and the alignment among technology design, instructional approach, and learning experiences may be more important. Thus, we classify three categories of instructional approaches that emphasize the {"}roles,{"} {"}tasks,{"} and {"}locations,{"} and discuss what and how different categories of AR approaches may help students learn. While AR offers new learning opportunities, it also creates new challenges for educators. We outline technological, pedagogical, learning issues related to the implementation of AR in education. For example, students in AR environments may be cognitively overloaded by the large amount of information they encounter, the multiple technological devices they are required to use, and the complex tasks they have to complete. This article provides possible solutions for some of the challenges and suggests topics and issues for future research.",
author = "Wu, {Hsin Kai} and Lee, {Silvia Wen Yu} and Chang, {Hsin Yi} and Liang, {Jyh Chong}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024",
language = "English",
volume = "62",
pages = "41--49",
journal = "Computers and Education",
issn = "0360-1315",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. / Wu, Hsin Kai; Lee, Silvia Wen Yu; Chang, Hsin Yi; Liang, Jyh Chong.

In: Computers and Education, Vol. 62, 01.01.2013, p. 41-49.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education

AU - Wu, Hsin Kai

AU - Lee, Silvia Wen Yu

AU - Chang, Hsin Yi

AU - Liang, Jyh Chong

PY - 2013/1/1

Y1 - 2013/1/1

N2 - Although augmented reality (AR) has gained much research attention in recent years, the term AR was given different meanings by varying researchers. In this article, we first provide an overview of definitions, taxonomies, and technologies of AR. We argue that viewing AR as a concept rather than a type of technology would be more productive for educators, researchers, and designers. Then we identify certain features and affordances of AR systems and applications. Yet, these compelling features may not be unique to AR applications and can be found in other technological systems or learning environments (e.g., ubiquitous and mobile learning environments). The instructional approach adopted by an AR system and the alignment among technology design, instructional approach, and learning experiences may be more important. Thus, we classify three categories of instructional approaches that emphasize the "roles," "tasks," and "locations," and discuss what and how different categories of AR approaches may help students learn. While AR offers new learning opportunities, it also creates new challenges for educators. We outline technological, pedagogical, learning issues related to the implementation of AR in education. For example, students in AR environments may be cognitively overloaded by the large amount of information they encounter, the multiple technological devices they are required to use, and the complex tasks they have to complete. This article provides possible solutions for some of the challenges and suggests topics and issues for future research.

AB - Although augmented reality (AR) has gained much research attention in recent years, the term AR was given different meanings by varying researchers. In this article, we first provide an overview of definitions, taxonomies, and technologies of AR. We argue that viewing AR as a concept rather than a type of technology would be more productive for educators, researchers, and designers. Then we identify certain features and affordances of AR systems and applications. Yet, these compelling features may not be unique to AR applications and can be found in other technological systems or learning environments (e.g., ubiquitous and mobile learning environments). The instructional approach adopted by an AR system and the alignment among technology design, instructional approach, and learning experiences may be more important. Thus, we classify three categories of instructional approaches that emphasize the "roles," "tasks," and "locations," and discuss what and how different categories of AR approaches may help students learn. While AR offers new learning opportunities, it also creates new challenges for educators. We outline technological, pedagogical, learning issues related to the implementation of AR in education. For example, students in AR environments may be cognitively overloaded by the large amount of information they encounter, the multiple technological devices they are required to use, and the complex tasks they have to complete. This article provides possible solutions for some of the challenges and suggests topics and issues for future research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869888024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869888024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024

DO - 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84869888024

VL - 62

SP - 41

EP - 49

JO - Computers and Education

JF - Computers and Education

SN - 0360-1315

ER -