Characteristics of people with disabilities receiving assistive technology services in vocational rehabilitation: A logistic regression analysis

I. Chun Huang, Gladys Cheing, Philip Rumrill, Kevin Bengtson, Fong Chan, Jana Telzlaff, Mikael Snitker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The provision of assistive technology (AT) services could help people with disabilities overcome social and environmental barriers in the workplace to facilitate employment outcomes. However, little is known about the types of consumers who receive assistive technology services and who can most benefit from the services in vocational rehabilitation (VR). OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the characteristics of consumers receiving AT services in state VR agencies and identified complementary VR services associated with the provision of AT services. METHODS: A 10 random sample of VR consumers (N=32,088) whose cases were closed in fiscal year 2009 (FY 2009) were extracted from the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) database for a secondary data analysis multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Only 10.4 of VR consumers closed in FY 2009 received AT services. The majority of AT recipients reported sensory impairments (60.4) and physical impairments (27.6). Consumers older than 65 years of age (odds ratio [OR]=1.43; 95 confidence intervals [CI]: 1.18-1.74), with associate's degrees (OR=1.27; 95 CI: 1.15-1.41) and bachelor's degrees or higher (OR=1.77; 95 CI: 1.55-2.01), reporting sensory impairments (OR=3.78; 95 CI: 3.39-4.21), receiving cash benefits (OR=1.44; 95 CI: 1.29-1.60) and being employed at the time of application (OR=1.79; 95 CI: 1.62-1.98) were more likely to receive AT services. Compared to European Americans, African American (OR=0.77; 95 CI: 0.69-0.87) and Hispanic Americans (OR=0.84; 95 CI: 0.73-0.98) were less likely to receive AT services. Moreover, AT recipients were more likely to also obtain comprehensive assessment (OR=1.49; 95 CI: 1.38 to 1.66), college or university training (OR=1.56; 95 CI: 1.38 to 1.76), occupational or vocational training (OR=1.20; 95 CI: 1.05 to 1.37), augmentative skills training (OR=2.48; 95 CI: 2.09 to 2.94), and miscellaneous training (OR=1.47; 95 CI: 1.30 to 1.66); but less likely to obtain job readiness training (OR=0.75; 95 CI: 0.64 to 0.87) and job search assistance (OR=0.87; 95 CI: 0.76 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: The results provide insights into AT recipients in the state VR system. VR professionals and practitioners need to be aware of AT devices and job accommodation services as resources for people with disabilities to increase employability. Further consideration should be given to developing a systematic understanding of the provision of AT services in the VR system and evaluating its effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-72
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Vocational Rehabilitation
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Vocational Rehabilitation
Self-Help Devices
Disabled Persons
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Regression Analysis
Confidence Intervals
Vocational Education
antineoplaston A10

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Rehabilitation
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

@article{14e85b6c381449b4a8dcc089cd1d71aa,
title = "Characteristics of people with disabilities receiving assistive technology services in vocational rehabilitation: A logistic regression analysis",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The provision of assistive technology (AT) services could help people with disabilities overcome social and environmental barriers in the workplace to facilitate employment outcomes. However, little is known about the types of consumers who receive assistive technology services and who can most benefit from the services in vocational rehabilitation (VR). OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the characteristics of consumers receiving AT services in state VR agencies and identified complementary VR services associated with the provision of AT services. METHODS: A 10 random sample of VR consumers (N=32,088) whose cases were closed in fiscal year 2009 (FY 2009) were extracted from the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) database for a secondary data analysis multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Only 10.4 of VR consumers closed in FY 2009 received AT services. The majority of AT recipients reported sensory impairments (60.4) and physical impairments (27.6). Consumers older than 65 years of age (odds ratio [OR]=1.43; 95 confidence intervals [CI]: 1.18-1.74), with associate's degrees (OR=1.27; 95 CI: 1.15-1.41) and bachelor's degrees or higher (OR=1.77; 95 CI: 1.55-2.01), reporting sensory impairments (OR=3.78; 95 CI: 3.39-4.21), receiving cash benefits (OR=1.44; 95 CI: 1.29-1.60) and being employed at the time of application (OR=1.79; 95 CI: 1.62-1.98) were more likely to receive AT services. Compared to European Americans, African American (OR=0.77; 95 CI: 0.69-0.87) and Hispanic Americans (OR=0.84; 95 CI: 0.73-0.98) were less likely to receive AT services. Moreover, AT recipients were more likely to also obtain comprehensive assessment (OR=1.49; 95 CI: 1.38 to 1.66), college or university training (OR=1.56; 95 CI: 1.38 to 1.76), occupational or vocational training (OR=1.20; 95 CI: 1.05 to 1.37), augmentative skills training (OR=2.48; 95 CI: 2.09 to 2.94), and miscellaneous training (OR=1.47; 95 CI: 1.30 to 1.66); but less likely to obtain job readiness training (OR=0.75; 95 CI: 0.64 to 0.87) and job search assistance (OR=0.87; 95 CI: 0.76 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: The results provide insights into AT recipients in the state VR system. VR professionals and practitioners need to be aware of AT devices and job accommodation services as resources for people with disabilities to increase employability. Further consideration should be given to developing a systematic understanding of the provision of AT services in the VR system and evaluating its effectiveness.",
author = "Huang, {I. Chun} and Gladys Cheing and Philip Rumrill and Kevin Bengtson and Fong Chan and Jana Telzlaff and Mikael Snitker",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/JVR-160811",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "63--72",
journal = "Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation",
issn = "1052-2263",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "1",

}

Characteristics of people with disabilities receiving assistive technology services in vocational rehabilitation : A logistic regression analysis. / Huang, I. Chun; Cheing, Gladys; Rumrill, Philip; Bengtson, Kevin; Chan, Fong; Telzlaff, Jana; Snitker, Mikael.

In: Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, Vol. 45, No. 1, 01.01.2016, p. 63-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Characteristics of people with disabilities receiving assistive technology services in vocational rehabilitation

T2 - A logistic regression analysis

AU - Huang, I. Chun

AU - Cheing, Gladys

AU - Rumrill, Philip

AU - Bengtson, Kevin

AU - Chan, Fong

AU - Telzlaff, Jana

AU - Snitker, Mikael

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: The provision of assistive technology (AT) services could help people with disabilities overcome social and environmental barriers in the workplace to facilitate employment outcomes. However, little is known about the types of consumers who receive assistive technology services and who can most benefit from the services in vocational rehabilitation (VR). OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the characteristics of consumers receiving AT services in state VR agencies and identified complementary VR services associated with the provision of AT services. METHODS: A 10 random sample of VR consumers (N=32,088) whose cases were closed in fiscal year 2009 (FY 2009) were extracted from the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) database for a secondary data analysis multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Only 10.4 of VR consumers closed in FY 2009 received AT services. The majority of AT recipients reported sensory impairments (60.4) and physical impairments (27.6). Consumers older than 65 years of age (odds ratio [OR]=1.43; 95 confidence intervals [CI]: 1.18-1.74), with associate's degrees (OR=1.27; 95 CI: 1.15-1.41) and bachelor's degrees or higher (OR=1.77; 95 CI: 1.55-2.01), reporting sensory impairments (OR=3.78; 95 CI: 3.39-4.21), receiving cash benefits (OR=1.44; 95 CI: 1.29-1.60) and being employed at the time of application (OR=1.79; 95 CI: 1.62-1.98) were more likely to receive AT services. Compared to European Americans, African American (OR=0.77; 95 CI: 0.69-0.87) and Hispanic Americans (OR=0.84; 95 CI: 0.73-0.98) were less likely to receive AT services. Moreover, AT recipients were more likely to also obtain comprehensive assessment (OR=1.49; 95 CI: 1.38 to 1.66), college or university training (OR=1.56; 95 CI: 1.38 to 1.76), occupational or vocational training (OR=1.20; 95 CI: 1.05 to 1.37), augmentative skills training (OR=2.48; 95 CI: 2.09 to 2.94), and miscellaneous training (OR=1.47; 95 CI: 1.30 to 1.66); but less likely to obtain job readiness training (OR=0.75; 95 CI: 0.64 to 0.87) and job search assistance (OR=0.87; 95 CI: 0.76 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: The results provide insights into AT recipients in the state VR system. VR professionals and practitioners need to be aware of AT devices and job accommodation services as resources for people with disabilities to increase employability. Further consideration should be given to developing a systematic understanding of the provision of AT services in the VR system and evaluating its effectiveness.

AB - BACKGROUND: The provision of assistive technology (AT) services could help people with disabilities overcome social and environmental barriers in the workplace to facilitate employment outcomes. However, little is known about the types of consumers who receive assistive technology services and who can most benefit from the services in vocational rehabilitation (VR). OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the characteristics of consumers receiving AT services in state VR agencies and identified complementary VR services associated with the provision of AT services. METHODS: A 10 random sample of VR consumers (N=32,088) whose cases were closed in fiscal year 2009 (FY 2009) were extracted from the Rehabilitation Services Administration (RSA) database for a secondary data analysis multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Only 10.4 of VR consumers closed in FY 2009 received AT services. The majority of AT recipients reported sensory impairments (60.4) and physical impairments (27.6). Consumers older than 65 years of age (odds ratio [OR]=1.43; 95 confidence intervals [CI]: 1.18-1.74), with associate's degrees (OR=1.27; 95 CI: 1.15-1.41) and bachelor's degrees or higher (OR=1.77; 95 CI: 1.55-2.01), reporting sensory impairments (OR=3.78; 95 CI: 3.39-4.21), receiving cash benefits (OR=1.44; 95 CI: 1.29-1.60) and being employed at the time of application (OR=1.79; 95 CI: 1.62-1.98) were more likely to receive AT services. Compared to European Americans, African American (OR=0.77; 95 CI: 0.69-0.87) and Hispanic Americans (OR=0.84; 95 CI: 0.73-0.98) were less likely to receive AT services. Moreover, AT recipients were more likely to also obtain comprehensive assessment (OR=1.49; 95 CI: 1.38 to 1.66), college or university training (OR=1.56; 95 CI: 1.38 to 1.76), occupational or vocational training (OR=1.20; 95 CI: 1.05 to 1.37), augmentative skills training (OR=2.48; 95 CI: 2.09 to 2.94), and miscellaneous training (OR=1.47; 95 CI: 1.30 to 1.66); but less likely to obtain job readiness training (OR=0.75; 95 CI: 0.64 to 0.87) and job search assistance (OR=0.87; 95 CI: 0.76 to 0.99). CONCLUSION: The results provide insights into AT recipients in the state VR system. VR professionals and practitioners need to be aware of AT devices and job accommodation services as resources for people with disabilities to increase employability. Further consideration should be given to developing a systematic understanding of the provision of AT services in the VR system and evaluating its effectiveness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977546635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977546635&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/JVR-160811

DO - 10.3233/JVR-160811

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84977546635

VL - 45

SP - 63

EP - 72

JO - Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation

JF - Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation

SN - 1052-2263

IS - 1

ER -