Analyzing the effects of various concept mapping techniques on learning achievement under different learning styles

Chei-Chang Chiou, Li Tze Lee, Li Chu Tien, Yu Min Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study explored the effectiveness of different concept mapping techniques on the learning achievement of senior accounting students and whether achievements attained using various techniques are affected by different learning styles. The techniques are computer-assisted construct-by-self-concept mapping (CACSB), computer-assisted construct-on-scaffold concept mapping (CACOS), paper-and-pencil concept mapping (PAP), and traditional textbook exercise (TTE) methods. A pretest-posttest control group design was employed. The subjects were 151 students who were taking an advanced accounting course. An analysis of covariance was used to analyze the results. The research findings are fourfold: (1) the two computer-assisted concept mapping techniques (CACSB and CACOS) are more beneficial to students' learning achievement than PAP and TTE; (2) PAP is better than TTE in relation to students' learning achievement; (3) when students' different learning styles were taken into account, CACOS offers better assistance to students who have accommodating and converging learning styles, followed by CACBS, PAP, and TTE; (4) for students who have assimilating and diverging learning styles, CACSB has the most significant effects on their learning achievement, followed by CACOS, PAP, and TTE. The computer-assisted concept mapping technique needs to fit learners' learning styles. The match between learning styles and learning techniques will further enhance learning achievement.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3687-3708
Number of pages22
JournalEurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Volume13
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Learning Styles
Textbooks
learning
Students
Scaffold
Exercise
textbook
Scaffolds
self-concept
student
Student Learning
Concepts
Learning
Analysis of Covariance
Pre-test

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Applied Mathematics

Cite this

@article{80dac153b9b64b42a67a6305cf20c858,
title = "Analyzing the effects of various concept mapping techniques on learning achievement under different learning styles",
abstract = "This study explored the effectiveness of different concept mapping techniques on the learning achievement of senior accounting students and whether achievements attained using various techniques are affected by different learning styles. The techniques are computer-assisted construct-by-self-concept mapping (CACSB), computer-assisted construct-on-scaffold concept mapping (CACOS), paper-and-pencil concept mapping (PAP), and traditional textbook exercise (TTE) methods. A pretest-posttest control group design was employed. The subjects were 151 students who were taking an advanced accounting course. An analysis of covariance was used to analyze the results. The research findings are fourfold: (1) the two computer-assisted concept mapping techniques (CACSB and CACOS) are more beneficial to students' learning achievement than PAP and TTE; (2) PAP is better than TTE in relation to students' learning achievement; (3) when students' different learning styles were taken into account, CACOS offers better assistance to students who have accommodating and converging learning styles, followed by CACBS, PAP, and TTE; (4) for students who have assimilating and diverging learning styles, CACSB has the most significant effects on their learning achievement, followed by CACOS, PAP, and TTE. The computer-assisted concept mapping technique needs to fit learners' learning styles. The match between learning styles and learning techniques will further enhance learning achievement.",
author = "Chei-Chang Chiou and Lee, {Li Tze} and Tien, {Li Chu} and Wang, {Yu Min}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.12973/eurasia.2017.00753a",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "3687--3708",
journal = "Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education",
issn = "1305-8215",
publisher = "Moment Publications",
number = "7",

}

Analyzing the effects of various concept mapping techniques on learning achievement under different learning styles. / Chiou, Chei-Chang; Lee, Li Tze; Tien, Li Chu; Wang, Yu Min.

In: Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, Vol. 13, No. 7, 01.01.2017, p. 3687-3708.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analyzing the effects of various concept mapping techniques on learning achievement under different learning styles

AU - Chiou, Chei-Chang

AU - Lee, Li Tze

AU - Tien, Li Chu

AU - Wang, Yu Min

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This study explored the effectiveness of different concept mapping techniques on the learning achievement of senior accounting students and whether achievements attained using various techniques are affected by different learning styles. The techniques are computer-assisted construct-by-self-concept mapping (CACSB), computer-assisted construct-on-scaffold concept mapping (CACOS), paper-and-pencil concept mapping (PAP), and traditional textbook exercise (TTE) methods. A pretest-posttest control group design was employed. The subjects were 151 students who were taking an advanced accounting course. An analysis of covariance was used to analyze the results. The research findings are fourfold: (1) the two computer-assisted concept mapping techniques (CACSB and CACOS) are more beneficial to students' learning achievement than PAP and TTE; (2) PAP is better than TTE in relation to students' learning achievement; (3) when students' different learning styles were taken into account, CACOS offers better assistance to students who have accommodating and converging learning styles, followed by CACBS, PAP, and TTE; (4) for students who have assimilating and diverging learning styles, CACSB has the most significant effects on their learning achievement, followed by CACOS, PAP, and TTE. The computer-assisted concept mapping technique needs to fit learners' learning styles. The match between learning styles and learning techniques will further enhance learning achievement.

AB - This study explored the effectiveness of different concept mapping techniques on the learning achievement of senior accounting students and whether achievements attained using various techniques are affected by different learning styles. The techniques are computer-assisted construct-by-self-concept mapping (CACSB), computer-assisted construct-on-scaffold concept mapping (CACOS), paper-and-pencil concept mapping (PAP), and traditional textbook exercise (TTE) methods. A pretest-posttest control group design was employed. The subjects were 151 students who were taking an advanced accounting course. An analysis of covariance was used to analyze the results. The research findings are fourfold: (1) the two computer-assisted concept mapping techniques (CACSB and CACOS) are more beneficial to students' learning achievement than PAP and TTE; (2) PAP is better than TTE in relation to students' learning achievement; (3) when students' different learning styles were taken into account, CACOS offers better assistance to students who have accommodating and converging learning styles, followed by CACBS, PAP, and TTE; (4) for students who have assimilating and diverging learning styles, CACSB has the most significant effects on their learning achievement, followed by CACOS, PAP, and TTE. The computer-assisted concept mapping technique needs to fit learners' learning styles. The match between learning styles and learning techniques will further enhance learning achievement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021688576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021688576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00753a

DO - 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00753a

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85021688576

VL - 13

SP - 3687

EP - 3708

JO - Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

JF - Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

SN - 1305-8215

IS - 7

ER -