Abstract
We used importance-agreement analysis to identify critical factors of the hospital survey on patient safety culture from the perceptions of physicians and nurses of a regional teaching hospital in terms of major strengths, minor strengths, minor weaknesses, and major weaknesses. In addition, we collected the raw data from 2011 to 2013 such that the advantages and deficiencies can be traced on a timely basis to enhance patient safety culture. The results show that there are 22, 21, and 21 items belonging to major strengths in 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. In contrast, there are 4, 5, and 5 items classified into major weaknesses in 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. This study also summarized the similarities and differences in this three-year period. Twenty items are the major strengths. On the contrary, only three items belonged to major weaknesses. Another viewpoint was also provided by taking into account genders in this three-year period. In summary, the hospital management can organize strategic adaptations to improve patient safety by observing the trends of strengths and weaknesses, as well as the similarities and differences in this threeyear period. Therefore, hospital management can take appropriate actions to maintain the advantages and address deficiencies in order to enhance patient safety culture in this case hospital.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1029-1044 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Journal | Journal of Testing and Evaluation |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2016 Jan 1 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Materials Science(all)
- Mechanics of Materials
- Mechanical Engineering
Cite this
}
A longitudinal study of identifying critical factors of patient safety culture in Taiwan. / Lee, Y. C.; Weng, S. J.; Huang, C. H.; Hsieh, W. L.; Hsieh, L. P.; Wu, Hsin-Hung.
In: Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 45, No. 3, 01.01.2016, p. 1029-1044.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - A longitudinal study of identifying critical factors of patient safety culture in Taiwan
AU - Lee, Y. C.
AU - Weng, S. J.
AU - Huang, C. H.
AU - Hsieh, W. L.
AU - Hsieh, L. P.
AU - Wu, Hsin-Hung
PY - 2016/1/1
Y1 - 2016/1/1
N2 - We used importance-agreement analysis to identify critical factors of the hospital survey on patient safety culture from the perceptions of physicians and nurses of a regional teaching hospital in terms of major strengths, minor strengths, minor weaknesses, and major weaknesses. In addition, we collected the raw data from 2011 to 2013 such that the advantages and deficiencies can be traced on a timely basis to enhance patient safety culture. The results show that there are 22, 21, and 21 items belonging to major strengths in 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. In contrast, there are 4, 5, and 5 items classified into major weaknesses in 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. This study also summarized the similarities and differences in this three-year period. Twenty items are the major strengths. On the contrary, only three items belonged to major weaknesses. Another viewpoint was also provided by taking into account genders in this three-year period. In summary, the hospital management can organize strategic adaptations to improve patient safety by observing the trends of strengths and weaknesses, as well as the similarities and differences in this threeyear period. Therefore, hospital management can take appropriate actions to maintain the advantages and address deficiencies in order to enhance patient safety culture in this case hospital.
AB - We used importance-agreement analysis to identify critical factors of the hospital survey on patient safety culture from the perceptions of physicians and nurses of a regional teaching hospital in terms of major strengths, minor strengths, minor weaknesses, and major weaknesses. In addition, we collected the raw data from 2011 to 2013 such that the advantages and deficiencies can be traced on a timely basis to enhance patient safety culture. The results show that there are 22, 21, and 21 items belonging to major strengths in 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. In contrast, there are 4, 5, and 5 items classified into major weaknesses in 2011, 2012, and 2013, respectively. This study also summarized the similarities and differences in this three-year period. Twenty items are the major strengths. On the contrary, only three items belonged to major weaknesses. Another viewpoint was also provided by taking into account genders in this three-year period. In summary, the hospital management can organize strategic adaptations to improve patient safety by observing the trends of strengths and weaknesses, as well as the similarities and differences in this threeyear period. Therefore, hospital management can take appropriate actions to maintain the advantages and address deficiencies in order to enhance patient safety culture in this case hospital.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029078466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029078466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1520/JTE20140444
DO - 10.1520/JTE20140444
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85029078466
VL - 45
SP - 1029
EP - 1044
JO - Journal of Testing and Evaluation
JF - Journal of Testing and Evaluation
SN - 0090-3973
IS - 3
ER -