A critical commentary on responseto-intervention

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 2004, the United States revised the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, allowing schools to use a new educational model, Response to Intervention (RTI), to identify students with learning disabilities eligible for special education. Since then, there has been much discussion in the American educational field about this model. The RTI model requires general education teachers and special education teachers to cooperate with each other and to deliver evidence-based instruction to students while systematically monitoring students' progress. Only those students who cannot meet particular goals can receive special education services. Many see the RTI model as a response to long-lasting controversy regarding the identification of learning disabilities; it is viewed as an improvement over the previous model, the discrepancy model. One group of researchers has argued that the discrepancy model is not capable of distinguishing students with learning disabilities from those with low achievement. The discrepancy model has also been criticized as a "wait-to-fail" model because schools must wait until students' performances are low enough before they can provide intervention. The introduction of RTI has led to significant changes in the American educational system. For example, it requires all educators to focus on students' performance. The model has potential to provide every child the opportunity to successfully learn in school. However, it has not yet been demonstrated that it can solve all problems related to the identification of learning disabilities. This article first reviews the fundamentals of RTI, then goes on to evaluate various effects of the model, and finally discusses potential challenges in RTI implementation. It is hoped that this article can help educators in Taiwan to use the experiences in the United States to rethink the Taiwanese model of identification and remediation for students with learning disabilities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)87-126
Number of pages40
JournalContemporary Educational Research Quarterly
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1

Fingerprint

learning disability
student
special education
model school
educator
general education
teacher
educational system
school
performance
Taiwan
disability
act
monitoring
instruction
evidence
education
experience
Group

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education

Cite this

@article{2c5db19d0b374176837f97589290e05c,
title = "A critical commentary on responseto-intervention",
abstract = "In 2004, the United States revised the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, allowing schools to use a new educational model, Response to Intervention (RTI), to identify students with learning disabilities eligible for special education. Since then, there has been much discussion in the American educational field about this model. The RTI model requires general education teachers and special education teachers to cooperate with each other and to deliver evidence-based instruction to students while systematically monitoring students' progress. Only those students who cannot meet particular goals can receive special education services. Many see the RTI model as a response to long-lasting controversy regarding the identification of learning disabilities; it is viewed as an improvement over the previous model, the discrepancy model. One group of researchers has argued that the discrepancy model is not capable of distinguishing students with learning disabilities from those with low achievement. The discrepancy model has also been criticized as a {"}wait-to-fail{"} model because schools must wait until students' performances are low enough before they can provide intervention. The introduction of RTI has led to significant changes in the American educational system. For example, it requires all educators to focus on students' performance. The model has potential to provide every child the opportunity to successfully learn in school. However, it has not yet been demonstrated that it can solve all problems related to the identification of learning disabilities. This article first reviews the fundamentals of RTI, then goes on to evaluate various effects of the model, and finally discusses potential challenges in RTI implementation. It is hoped that this article can help educators in Taiwan to use the experiences in the United States to rethink the Taiwanese model of identification and remediation for students with learning disabilities.",
author = "Wei-Pai Lu",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.6151/CERQ.2014.2201.03",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "87--126",
journal = "Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly",
issn = "1814-4810",
publisher = "National Taiwan Normal University Educational Research and Evaluation Center",
number = "1",

}

A critical commentary on responseto-intervention. / Lu, Wei-Pai.

In: Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 87-126.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A critical commentary on responseto-intervention

AU - Lu, Wei-Pai

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - In 2004, the United States revised the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, allowing schools to use a new educational model, Response to Intervention (RTI), to identify students with learning disabilities eligible for special education. Since then, there has been much discussion in the American educational field about this model. The RTI model requires general education teachers and special education teachers to cooperate with each other and to deliver evidence-based instruction to students while systematically monitoring students' progress. Only those students who cannot meet particular goals can receive special education services. Many see the RTI model as a response to long-lasting controversy regarding the identification of learning disabilities; it is viewed as an improvement over the previous model, the discrepancy model. One group of researchers has argued that the discrepancy model is not capable of distinguishing students with learning disabilities from those with low achievement. The discrepancy model has also been criticized as a "wait-to-fail" model because schools must wait until students' performances are low enough before they can provide intervention. The introduction of RTI has led to significant changes in the American educational system. For example, it requires all educators to focus on students' performance. The model has potential to provide every child the opportunity to successfully learn in school. However, it has not yet been demonstrated that it can solve all problems related to the identification of learning disabilities. This article first reviews the fundamentals of RTI, then goes on to evaluate various effects of the model, and finally discusses potential challenges in RTI implementation. It is hoped that this article can help educators in Taiwan to use the experiences in the United States to rethink the Taiwanese model of identification and remediation for students with learning disabilities.

AB - In 2004, the United States revised the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, allowing schools to use a new educational model, Response to Intervention (RTI), to identify students with learning disabilities eligible for special education. Since then, there has been much discussion in the American educational field about this model. The RTI model requires general education teachers and special education teachers to cooperate with each other and to deliver evidence-based instruction to students while systematically monitoring students' progress. Only those students who cannot meet particular goals can receive special education services. Many see the RTI model as a response to long-lasting controversy regarding the identification of learning disabilities; it is viewed as an improvement over the previous model, the discrepancy model. One group of researchers has argued that the discrepancy model is not capable of distinguishing students with learning disabilities from those with low achievement. The discrepancy model has also been criticized as a "wait-to-fail" model because schools must wait until students' performances are low enough before they can provide intervention. The introduction of RTI has led to significant changes in the American educational system. For example, it requires all educators to focus on students' performance. The model has potential to provide every child the opportunity to successfully learn in school. However, it has not yet been demonstrated that it can solve all problems related to the identification of learning disabilities. This article first reviews the fundamentals of RTI, then goes on to evaluate various effects of the model, and finally discusses potential challenges in RTI implementation. It is hoped that this article can help educators in Taiwan to use the experiences in the United States to rethink the Taiwanese model of identification and remediation for students with learning disabilities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962182272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962182272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.6151/CERQ.2014.2201.03

DO - 10.6151/CERQ.2014.2201.03

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 87

EP - 126

JO - Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly

JF - Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly

SN - 1814-4810

IS - 1

ER -